2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.11.16.22282396
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative effectiveness of two- and three-dose schedules involving AZD1222 and BNT162b2 in people with kidney disease: a linked OpenSAFELY and UK Renal Registry cohort study

Abstract: Background: Kidney disease is a key risk factor for COVID-19-related mortality and suboptimal vaccine response. Optimising vaccination strategies is essential to reduce the disease burden in this vulnerable population. Methods: With the approval of NHS England, we performed a retrospective cohort study to estimate the comparative effectiveness of schedules involving AZD1222 (AZ; ChAdOx1-S) and BNT162b2 (BNT) among people with kidney disease. Using linked primary care and UK Renal Registry records in the OpenSA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is emphasised by our finding that breadth of neutralisation (Fab function and potentially diversity) and complement binding (Fc function) are not mutually inclusive in patients requiring HD, but are influenced by the vaccine platform used. Boosting with a third mRV dose resulted in equivalent humoral responses in HD patients, independent of the vaccine type received previously, similar to what has been observed by others [51]. Again, this emphasises the importance of the maturation of antibody responses, presumably through further germinal centre induction, but may also indicate either that heterologous vaccination protocols can be beneficial in their own right or that mRNA vaccines offer some superiority in the HD population [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This is emphasised by our finding that breadth of neutralisation (Fab function and potentially diversity) and complement binding (Fc function) are not mutually inclusive in patients requiring HD, but are influenced by the vaccine platform used. Boosting with a third mRV dose resulted in equivalent humoral responses in HD patients, independent of the vaccine type received previously, similar to what has been observed by others [51]. Again, this emphasises the importance of the maturation of antibody responses, presumably through further germinal centre induction, but may also indicate either that heterologous vaccination protocols can be beneficial in their own right or that mRNA vaccines offer some superiority in the HD population [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…All codelists used to define conditions and variables are openly available online at www.OpenCodelists.org for inspection and re-use. Definitions used in this study reuse codelists developed for published studies (27,38,44,45).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure our cohort produced results consistent with previous literature, we included a control outcome for which we knew the expected direction of effect estimates. We used hospitalisation with COVID-19 ( Supplementary Methods) which should have a negative association with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination based on previous research (38,39). To account for the gap between SARS-CoV-2 infection and the recording of long COVID, we only analysed COVID-19 test results and hospitalisations >12 weeks before the end of follow up.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electronic health records (EHRs) are a valuable research tool to better understand the impact of health conditions. They have contributed to better understanding of COVID-19 fatalities (7,8), infection risk (9,10), the effectiveness of treatments (11,12) and vaccinations (13)(14)(15). However, long COVID in EHRs is poorly captured (16), and even in those that have a record this binary categorisation does not reflect the variety of experiences in those with long COVID, which may be better captured by patient-reported outcomes.…”
Section: Why Was the Cohort Set Up?mentioning
confidence: 99%

Cohort profile: OpenPROMPT

Henderson,
Carlile,
Dillingham
et al. 2023
Preprint
Self Cite