2014
DOI: 10.1002/pros.22921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative effectiveness of [18F]‐fluorocholine PET‐CT and pelvic MRI with diffusion‐weighted imaging for staging in patients with high‐risk prostate cancer

Abstract: This study highlights the interest of (18) F-Choline in the staging of high risk prostate cancer in addition with DWI MRI, especially so in the evaluation of lymph node involvement due to its high sensitivity and excellent specificity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
42
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Certainly each modality has its advantages. MRI provides a sharper, higher spatial resolution image and therefore a higher accuracy for the assessment of the delineation between the tumour and surrounding anatomical structures [17]. PSMA PET/CT detects the same if gross invasion is present, as was the case in the example given by Giesel et al [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Certainly each modality has its advantages. MRI provides a sharper, higher spatial resolution image and therefore a higher accuracy for the assessment of the delineation between the tumour and surrounding anatomical structures [17]. PSMA PET/CT detects the same if gross invasion is present, as was the case in the example given by Giesel et al [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Several studies have shown a limited sensitivity of 11 C-choline PET/CT for the detection of extracapsular extension (e.g., 22% and 27% reported by Martorana et al and Rinnab et al, respectively (16,25)). Those results were confirmed by Pinaquy et al, who recently reported a higher sensitivity of diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI than of 18 F-choline PET/CT (73% vs. 36%) for the detection of seminal vesicle invasion (26). In a recently published review, De Bari et al concluded that MRI is superior to 11 C-or 18 F-choline PET/CT in terms of sensitivity and specificity for the local assessment of PC (27).…”
Section: T Stagingmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…On a lymph node basis, sensitivity was 56.2% and specificity was 94.0%. 18 F-choline PET/CT failed to detect nodal metastases smaller than 5 mm (35) (26). On a region basis, they reported a higher sensitivity (56%) and a higher positive predictive value (98%) for 18 F-choline PET/CT than for DW MRI (17% and 97%, respectively).…”
Section: N Stagingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Общая чувствительность и специфич-ность составили 78 и 94 % для ПЭТ/КТ, и 33 и 91 % для МРТ соответственно [45]. При сравнении резуль-татов расширенной лимфодиссекции у 112 пациентов с РПЖ с данными ПЭТ/КТ с 18 F-холином чувстви-тельность, специфичность, положительная и отрица-тельная прогностическая ценность составили 33, 92, 76 и 65 % соответственно [46].…”
Section: рис 1 рецидив рпж в ложе удаленной пж: а б -на т2-ви и т1unclassified