Comparative Effectiveness of Different Forms of Telemedicine for Individuals with Heart Failure (HF): A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Abstract

BackgroundPrevious studies on telemedicine have either focused on its role in the management of chronic diseases in general or examined its effectiveness in comparison to standard post-discharge care. Little has been done to determine the comparative impact of different telemedicine options for a specific population such as individuals with heart failure (HF).Methods and FindingsSystematic reviews (SR) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined telephone support, telemonitoring, video monitoring or electrocardiographic monitoring for HF patients were identified using a comprehensive search of the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and The Cochrane Library. Studies were included if they reported the primary outcome of mortality or any of the following secondary outcomes: all-cause hospitalization and heart failure hospitalization. Thirty RCTs (N = 10,193 patients) were included. Compared to usual care, structured telephone support was found to reduce the odds of mortality(Odds Ratio 0.80; 95% Credible Intervals [0.66 to 0.96]) and hospitalizations due to heart failure (0.69; [0.56 to 0.85]). Telemonitoring was also found to reduce the odds of mortality(0.53; [0.36 to 0.80]) and reduce hospitalizations related to heart failure (0.64; [0.39 to 0.95]) compared to usual post-discharge care. Interventions that involved ECG monitoring also reduced the odds of hospitalization due to heart failure (0.71; [0.52 to 0.98]).LimitationsMuch of the evidence currently available has focused on the comparing either telephone support or telemonitoring with usual care. This has therefore limited our current understanding of how some of the less common forms of telemedicine compare to one another.ConclusionsCompared to usual care, structured telephone support and telemonitoring significantly reduced the odds of deaths and hospitalization due to heart failure. Despite being the most widely studied forms of telemedicine, little has been done to directly compare these two interventions against one another. Further research into their comparative cost-effectiveness is also warranted.

Clinical Effectiveness of Telemedicine for Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

“…In a recent network meta-analysis of 30 RCTs by Kotb et al ,13 teletransmission was found to reduce the odds of mortality as well as the HF-related hospitalizations compared with the standard care. In addition, structured telephone support reduced the odds of HF-related mortality and hospitalizations, while ECG monitoring reduced the odds of HF-related hospitalizations 13.…”

Recommendations for the Implementation of Telehealth in Cardiovascular and Stroke Care: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association

“…In a recent report, only 15% of family practitioners used telehealth to provide health care. 31 One adaptation of multidisciplinary disease management has been to use telephone calls. This strategy may e27…”

Telemonitoring for Seniors with Chronic Heart Failure: Patient Self-Care, Empowerment, and Adoption Factors

“…Prior research in the area of TM has focused on the impacts of this patient management approach, mostly in relation to symptoms, mortality, and the utilization of services [17,18,23]. Yet, limited evidence exists on the actual effects of TM on patients' behaviors, especially patient empowerment and selfcare, with the exception of general discussion on patients' acceptability and attitude towards the technology.…”