2020
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Effectiveness of Community-Based vs Clinic-Based Healthy Choices Motivational Intervention to Improve Health Behaviors Among Youth Living With HIV

Abstract: This randomized clinical trial assesses the comparative effectiveness of the Healthy Choices intervention when delivered in a clinic- vs home-based setting on medication adherence and alcohol use among youths and young adults living with HIV.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[49][50][51] Behavioral interventions have demonstrated efficacy in improving behaviors directly aimed at enhancing TasP. [52][53][54][55] Structural interventions and resource investments are now needed to bring these and other evidence-based interventions into the standard of clinical care for people receiving ART.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[49][50][51] Behavioral interventions have demonstrated efficacy in improving behaviors directly aimed at enhancing TasP. [52][53][54][55] Structural interventions and resource investments are now needed to bring these and other evidence-based interventions into the standard of clinical care for people receiving ART.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most psychosocial staff achieved at least intermediate competency, the level of fidelity typically required in randomized clinical trials, 45 suggesting that psychologists and social workers maybe the most successful as internal facilitators. However, one-third of physicians and paraprofessional staffs achieved this competency, which may have positive rippling effects across the organization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HIV behavioral-intervention literature includes relatively few completed randomized controlled trials comparing one structured intervention with another structured intervention diverging only in certain components or mode of delivery. 7,[39][40][41][42] Findings of significant outcome differences between such interventions are rare, 39,40 with some manifesting in the opposite direction from that expected. 40 A faithbased adaptation of the evidence-based "SISTA" HIV prevention intervention stands out in its demonstration of noninferiority for the primary outcome (consistent condom use) and some benefits beyond those of the original intervention, 39 perhaps due to the collaborative redesign process (with a "Church Advisory Board") and/or the testing of the intervention in the community and congregation to which it was tailored.…”
Section: Contextualization Of Null Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,[39][40][41][42] Findings of significant outcome differences between such interventions are rare, 39,40 with some manifesting in the opposite direction from that expected. 40 A faithbased adaptation of the evidence-based "SISTA" HIV prevention intervention stands out in its demonstration of noninferiority for the primary outcome (consistent condom use) and some benefits beyond those of the original intervention, 39 perhaps due to the collaborative redesign process (with a "Church Advisory Board") and/or the testing of the intervention in the community and congregation to which it was tailored. In a Baltimore randomized controlled trial, an evidence-based case-management intervention ("Project Bridge," designed for PWH transitioning from incarceration) that was adapted to support PWH on probation/parole showed no outcome benefits over usual care.…”
Section: Contextualization Of Null Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%