2022
DOI: 10.5334/aogh.3602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Effectiveness of an In-Person and a Virtual Basic Emergency Care Instructor Course

Abstract: Background: Resource limited settings have an ongoing need for access to quality emergency care. The World Health Organization -International Committee of the Red Cross Basic Emergency Care (BEC) course is one mechanism to address this need. Training of BEC trainers has been challenging due to barriers including cost, travel logistics, scheduling, and more recently, social distancing regulations related to the coronavirus pandemic.Objective: We seek to determine if an online virtual format is an effective way … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…implemented the World Health Organization Basic Emergency Care (BEC) course for the first time in a European context and during an active humanitarian conflict and demonstrated improvement in emergency care knowledge and skill performance. Finally, in a second paper from Kivlehan et al., 69 no significant difference in pre‐ and posttest improvement or perceived quality of the training was found between BEC training‐of‐trainers courses offered in person or virtually.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…implemented the World Health Organization Basic Emergency Care (BEC) course for the first time in a European context and during an active humanitarian conflict and demonstrated improvement in emergency care knowledge and skill performance. Finally, in a second paper from Kivlehan et al., 69 no significant difference in pre‐ and posttest improvement or perceived quality of the training was found between BEC training‐of‐trainers courses offered in person or virtually.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%