The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative effect of simulated solar light, UV, UV/H2O2 and photo-Fenton treatment (UV–Vis/H2O2/Fe2+,3+) in the Escherichia coli inactivation in artificial seawater

Abstract: Fe 2þ and 10 mg L À1 of H 2 O 2 , led to the fastest bacterial inactivation kinetics. Using H 2 O 2 / UV 254 high disinfection rates were obtained similar to those obtained with photo-Fenton under UV 254 light. In Milli-Q water, the rate of inactivation for Escherichia coli was higher than in Leman Lake water and seawater due to the lack of inorganic ions affecting negatively bacteria inactivation. The presence of bicarbonate showed scavenging of the OH radicals generated in the treatment of photo-Fenton and H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solar irradiation is currently promoted for water treatment since it is a cheap and renewable source of energy and it has been used both for bacteria inactivation [28] and water decontamination [29]. Yet, and as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Solar/fe 2+ Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solar irradiation is currently promoted for water treatment since it is a cheap and renewable source of energy and it has been used both for bacteria inactivation [28] and water decontamination [29]. Yet, and as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Solar/fe 2+ Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of AOPs have been studied for different kinds of wastewater (Agustina et al 2005;Sillanpää et al 2011;Choi et al 2013;Del Moro et al 2013) and are a good option for the removal of persistent pollutants when conventional processes are not enough (Moreira et al 2005). In addition, due to high disinfection efficiency, the AOPs are considered a good treatment against most viruses, bacteria and protozoa (Guo et al 2009;Rubio et al 2013). The most common method used to control the quality of water is Escherichia coli (Pitkänen et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can possibly be accounted for by the partial scavenging of endogenously produced or exogenously produced ·  OH in the presence of chloride ions [38]. Therefore, when B. ovatus is released into seawater with AOM, B. ovatus cells have a half-life of 11.4 min, which is essentially the same as the half-life for the high salinity water without AOM (i.e., 12.6 min).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%