1986
DOI: 10.1017/s0003356100018419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative digestibility experiments with growing pigs and adult sows

Abstract: The digestive ability of growing pigs and large adult sows was compared in digestibility experiments with 26 foodstuffs and diets. In all cases, the sows showed superior digestibility of nutrients. On average, the sows digested 150 g more crude protein, 100 g more crude fat, 300 g more crude fibre per kg diet and proportionately 0-09 more gross energy than the young animals. The superior ability of the sows to digest gross energy was negatively correlated with the soluble carbohydrate and gross energy concentr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
1
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(8 reference statements)
4
32
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent to the present study, Le Goff & Noblet (2001) also observed an improved digestibility of organic matter, energy and crude protein for adult sows compared to growing pigs. The data from the present experiment showed in most instances a positive effect of increasing BW on apparent digestibility, comparable with the results of Fernández et al (1986) and Le Goff & Noblet (2001), where adult sows showed a superior digestibility of nutrients compared to growing pigs. In contrast, Kass et al (1980) found a negative effect of increasing BW on digestive capacity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Consistent to the present study, Le Goff & Noblet (2001) also observed an improved digestibility of organic matter, energy and crude protein for adult sows compared to growing pigs. The data from the present experiment showed in most instances a positive effect of increasing BW on apparent digestibility, comparable with the results of Fernández et al (1986) and Le Goff & Noblet (2001), where adult sows showed a superior digestibility of nutrients compared to growing pigs. In contrast, Kass et al (1980) found a negative effect of increasing BW on digestive capacity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The probable explanation for this is that as pigs grow, their digestive tract bacterial profile becomes more stable, especially the hind-gut bacteria (Varel et al, 1982), and also the capacity of the hindgut increases in response to fibrous diets (Bach Knudsen and Jørgensen, 2001). Previous studies have confirmed that the ability of pigs to digest and utilize fibre in the diet is proportional to their age and live body weight (Fernandez et al, 1986;Shi and Noblet, 1993;Reverter et al, 1999;Le Goff et al, 2003). However, Jørgensen et al (1996) found that animals given a high fiber diet in fact had higher daily live weight gain compared with pigs on a low fiber diet.…”
Section: Pig Performancementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, other factors related to nutrient (and energy) utilization in specific tissues should be implicated in the comparatively lower metabolic efficiency of IB pigs observed in previous studies (Nieto et al, 2002;Rivera-Ferre et al, 2006;Barea et al, 2007). On the other hand, the higher TTAD coefficients observed in IB pigs at higher BW may be mainly related to a more important contribution of the large intestine to the overall digestion of dietary compounds (Ferná ndez et al, 1986;Noblet and Shi, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%