1983
DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100010110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative cost of walking in young and old adults

Abstract: Normative data that summarize the energy requirements and gait characteristics of level outdoor walking were determined in 111 normal subjects between the ages of 20 and 80 years. Subjects were divided into two age groups: young adults (20-59 years) and senior subjects (60-80 years). The mean rate of oxygen consumption for young adults and senior subjects did not significantly differ, averaging 11.9 ml/kg-min for both groups. The data on heart rate paralleled the findings on oxygen consumption, averaging 100 a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
43
3
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
6
43
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…EEs recorded in the control group at rest and when walking were in line with data reported for active male subjects [20,27,39]. The rate for control subjects when walking was slightly higher than [40] or similar to [1] that generally reported because our physically fit population adopted a more rapid spontaneous pace.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…EEs recorded in the control group at rest and when walking were in line with data reported for active male subjects [20,27,39]. The rate for control subjects when walking was slightly higher than [40] or similar to [1] that generally reported because our physically fit population adopted a more rapid spontaneous pace.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The 6MWT performance remained consistent throughout the study even after the subjects were fit with four different prosthetic feet. The walking velocities of this study group were found to be faster than prior studies have reported, especially with the PVD group [44][45]. The non-PVD group was faster than the PVD group but not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Energy expenditure for the task was defined as the average of oxygen consumption from the end of the task to oneminute after task completion. The latter time point was selected to represent the energy expenditure for the task because: (a) for many individuals in the VF and VH groups, the instrument did not capture or record a breath or recorded very few breaths on expiration during the reading task, and (b) oxygen consumption continued to increase during the minute after the reading task, indicating that participants tended to pay for the task after the task had been completed (Mc Cardle et al, 2007;Waters et al, 1983). One of the reasons for the lack of or minimal recorded breaths during the task could be attributable to "possible breath holding" during reading by participants resulting in minimal airflow on expiration (Gillespie, GartnerSchmidt, Rubinstein, & Verdolini-Abbott, 2013) and the inability of the instrument to record a breath on expiration.…”
Section: Gross Metabolic Cost For Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%