1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00319-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative corneal topography and refractive variables in monozygotic and dizygotic twins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…98 All of these studies found significant differences in the intrapair correlations for spherical refractive errors between monozygotic and dizygotic twins, suggesting that genetic influences on myopia and hyperopia are strong. The correlations between monozygotic twins for astigmatism were not significantly different from the correlations between dizygotic twins in these studies.…”
Section: Genetics and Astigmatismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…98 All of these studies found significant differences in the intrapair correlations for spherical refractive errors between monozygotic and dizygotic twins, suggesting that genetic influences on myopia and hyperopia are strong. The correlations between monozygotic twins for astigmatism were not significantly different from the correlations between dizygotic twins in these studies.…”
Section: Genetics and Astigmatismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies comparing monozygotic and dizygotic twins have investigated the genetic influence on astigmatic refractive errors, [96][97][98][99] including Teikari and O'Donnell, 96 Teikari and associates 97 and Valluri and colleagues. 98 All of these studies found significant differences in the intrapair correlations for spherical refractive errors between monozygotic and dizygotic twins, suggesting that genetic influences on myopia and hyperopia are strong.…”
Section: Genetics and Astigmatismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…23,24 Valluri et al reported a stronger role of environment factors in development of astigmatism. 10 There have been conflicting data about the association of increased percentage of astigmatism in infants with prematurity or low birth weight, and with retinopathy of prematurity, but the association of height, weight, and astigmatism have not been described in preschool children. Some but not all studies find higher rates of astigmatism among subjects with ametropia in either the myopic or hyperopic direction, particularly for higher magnitude spherical refractive errors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Valluri et al reported a stronger role of environment factors. 10 In a study by Dobson et al, against the rule (ATR) astigmatism was 2.5 times more common than with the rule (WTR) in children younger than 3.5 yrs of age. 4 In contrast, WTR Astigmatism was 3 times more common in children older than 5.5 yrs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%