2008
DOI: 10.1159/000163093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative chromosome painting between chicken and spectacled owl <i>(Pulsatrix perspicillata):</i> implications for chromosomal evolution in the Strigidae (Aves, Strigiformes)

Abstract: The spectacled owl (Pulsatrix perspicillata), a species found in the Neotropical region, has 76 chromosomes, with a high number of biarmed chromosomes. In order to define homologies between Gallus gallus and Pulsatrixperspicillata (Strigiformes, Strigidae), we used chromosome painting with chicken DNA probes of chromosomes 1–10 and Z and telomeric sequences. This approach allowed a comparison between Pulsatrixperspicillata and other species of Strigidae already analyzed by chromosome painting (Strix nebulosa a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since both GGA4 and GGA5 delineated multiple syntenic segments in coot and common moorhen, we conclude that fission of the ancestral GGA chromosomes was followed by fusion events in Gruiformes. With the notable exception of 1 species of Strigiformes [de Oliveira et al, 2008], associations of GGA4/GGA5 and GGA6/GGA7 are not known in other lineages. Because most Neoaves lack these associations, it is plausible to assume that GGA4/GGA5 and GGG6/ GGA7 originated independently in Gruiformes and Strigiformes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since both GGA4 and GGA5 delineated multiple syntenic segments in coot and common moorhen, we conclude that fission of the ancestral GGA chromosomes was followed by fusion events in Gruiformes. With the notable exception of 1 species of Strigiformes [de Oliveira et al, 2008], associations of GGA4/GGA5 and GGA6/GGA7 are not known in other lineages. Because most Neoaves lack these associations, it is plausible to assume that GGA4/GGA5 and GGG6/ GGA7 originated independently in Gruiformes and Strigiformes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GGA karyotype is considered to be closely related to the putative ancestral bird karyotype [Schmid et al, 2000;Shibusawa et al, 2004a;Griffin et al, 2007], and its genome is the only one in the avian class that has undergone wholegenome sequencing [Hillier et al, 2004]. Up to date about 40 bird species belonging to 10 orders have been analyzed by Zoo-FISH with chicken paints derived from flow-sorted chromosomes [Shetty et al, 1999;Schmid et al, 2000;Raudsepp et al, 2002;Guttenbach et al, 2003;Kasai et al, 2003;Derjusheva et al, 2004;Shibusawa et al, 2004a, b;de Oliveira et al, 2005de Oliveira et al, , 2008Nanda et al, 2006Nanda et al, , 2007Nishida-Umehara et al, 2007;Nishida et al, 2008]. Comparative analyses with chicken paints in different birds have successfully contributed to trace evolutionary relationships among diverse species, particularly providing insights into the chromosomal reorganization of the ancestral bird karyotype.…”
Section: Cross-speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent chromosome painting studies in birds with chicken chromosome-specific DNA probes have revealed chromosome homologies and interchromosomal rearrangements between the chicken and 52 avian species representing 12 orders Nishida-Umehara et al, 2007;Nanda et al, 2007Nanda et al, , 2011de Oliveira et al, 2008de Oliveira et al, , 2010Nishida et al, 2008Nishida et al, , 2013Nie et al, 2009). The distribution of telomeric (TTAGGG)n repeats and the 18S-28S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes have also provided us with basic information on karyotype reorganization in avian species because the chromosomal distributions of the 18S-28S rRNA genes are highly variable between species and the presence of interstitial telomeric repeats is one piece of evidence for telomere-to-telomere fusions in chromosomes (Meyne et al, 1990;Nanda et al, 2002;Delany et al, 2009;Nishida et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%