2009
DOI: 10.17159/2078-516x/2009/v21i2a298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative characteristics of elite New Zealand and South African u/16 rugby players with reference to gamespecific skills, physical abilities and anthropometric data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although such studies provide data which has implications on identifying key characteristics in rugby, the main limitation of such studies is that between-group differences may reflect the possible influence of age, growth and biological maturation. Spamer et al 11 compared characteristics of U16 rugby players from New Zealand (NZ, higher level) and South African (SA, lower level). Such age-specific comparisons are more likely to provide highly relevant information on the attributes important for rugby at the specified age category with little or no possible influence of age or maturity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although such studies provide data which has implications on identifying key characteristics in rugby, the main limitation of such studies is that between-group differences may reflect the possible influence of age, growth and biological maturation. Spamer et al 11 compared characteristics of U16 rugby players from New Zealand (NZ, higher level) and South African (SA, lower level). Such age-specific comparisons are more likely to provide highly relevant information on the attributes important for rugby at the specified age category with little or no possible influence of age or maturity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are numerous studies documenting the characteristics of male adolescents playing U13 to U19 competitive rugby,6–13 no such studies have been conducted for Zimbabwean school-based adolescent male rugby players. Therefore, there is limited understanding of the qualities of Zimbabwean U16 rugby players playing competitive rugby and how they differ by playing standards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, literature adopting a positivist approach towards elite athlete development has highlighted the intrusive surveillance mechanisms deployed to identify and analyse performance. Comparative studies of elite youth rugby (Plotz and Spamer 2006;Spamer 2000;Spamer and Winsley 2003) and elite youth football (Reilly et al 2000;Wong et al 2009) have identified the anthropometrical, physical and motor variables required to become successful athletes. Moreover, the use of molecular biology techniques have been employed to recognise specific genetic traits that have evident links with physiological, anatomical and biochemical indicators of elite athletic performance (Calò and Vona 2008).…”
Section: Academy Institutions and The Elite Sport Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies investigating the influence of playing standard on RU players attributes have established that anthropometric, physiological characteristics and game skills improve with increasing playing standards [12][13][14][15][16]. Body mass was greater in elite U16 RU athletes from a country known to have higher rugby playing standards compared to elite U16 players derived from a country known to have relatively lesser rugby standards [16]. Jones et al, [12] showed that upper-body muscular strength, 40-m speed, and aerobic fitness contribute to higher playing standard of U18 academy players when compared to lower-level U18 schoolboy rugby players.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jones et al, [12] showed that upper-body muscular strength, 40-m speed, and aerobic fitness contribute to higher playing standard of U18 academy players when compared to lower-level U18 schoolboy rugby players. However, conflicting results have been reported for sum of skinfold thickness measurements [16][17][18][19][20]. In related intermittent sports, lower-body muscular power and agility discriminated U16 elite from sub-elite soccer players [21], whilst elite U16 rugby league (RL) players had better speed, agility, and aerobic capacity compared to sub-elite players [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%