2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative carbon stability in surface soils and subsoils under submerged rice and upland non-rice crop ecologies: A physical fractionation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Physical fractionation of soils was done to comprehend soil structure and C distribution within aggregates and in attachment with mineral matrix [ 35 , 36 , 38 , 54 ]. In density fractionation, heavy density fraction represented humified/ amorphous organic matter attached to soil mineral matrix [ 55 ] whereas light density fraction represented loose and undecomposed plant/ organic residues [ 55 , 56 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Physical fractionation of soils was done to comprehend soil structure and C distribution within aggregates and in attachment with mineral matrix [ 35 , 36 , 38 , 54 ]. In density fractionation, heavy density fraction represented humified/ amorphous organic matter attached to soil mineral matrix [ 55 ] whereas light density fraction represented loose and undecomposed plant/ organic residues [ 55 , 56 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While humic substances and soil particles combine to form microaggregates, microbial polysaccharides, organic mucilages bind the microaggregates into larger macroaggregates [ 61 ]. Conversely, tillage operations break-down the macroaggregates in croplands, exposing physically protected C to soil microorganisms and causing C loss from soils [ 36 , 62 ]. In this study, highest and lowest soil macroagegate formation was observed in forest and cropland soils.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations