2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.102105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative biology of germ-free and conventional poultry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Virtually no mechanistic work has been performed in detail in poultry birds, especially without resorting to antibiotic-induced microbiota suppression 63 . In GF animals, absence of GM leads to altered gene expression and metabolite concentrations in the caecal compartment, signaling changes in intestinal physiology, probably represented by reduced villi, thinner walls, and a more acidic pH as already discussed elsewhere 64,65 . Notably, the near total absence of butyrate and propionate in the caecal contents and in peripheral organs of GF animals confirms their exclusive bacterial origin in our model, since they are unlikely to be produced in significant amounts by the host metabolic machinery 49,66 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Virtually no mechanistic work has been performed in detail in poultry birds, especially without resorting to antibiotic-induced microbiota suppression 63 . In GF animals, absence of GM leads to altered gene expression and metabolite concentrations in the caecal compartment, signaling changes in intestinal physiology, probably represented by reduced villi, thinner walls, and a more acidic pH as already discussed elsewhere 64,65 . Notably, the near total absence of butyrate and propionate in the caecal contents and in peripheral organs of GF animals confirms their exclusive bacterial origin in our model, since they are unlikely to be produced in significant amounts by the host metabolic machinery 49,66 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In the past decade, our comprehension of the intestinal flora has undergone a nearly exponential expansion [ 40 ]. The increasing recognition of the importance of the intestinal flora is helped by the advent of innovative methodologies and technologies, including germ-free animals [ 41 ], fecal microbiota transplantation [ 42 ], and omics [ 43 ]. Genetic studies have estimated that human genetics can explain 1.9%-8.1% of the variation in the gut microbiome [ 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the immune system plays a crucial role in shaping and maintaining the chicken gut microbiota, and that the gut microbiota itself contributes to immune system maturation (1,2). Raising chickens in a germfree environment has been shown to lead to decreased maturation of both the innate and adaptive immune response, and gut physiology (2,3). Providing chicks with exposure to caecal/faecal content transplants from adult birds, or with synthetic communities of microbes constructed from microbes isolated from the chicken gut, has been shown to modulate the immune system (4)(5)(6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%