“…The present findings are congruent with reviews discussed above indicating that antidepressant drug-vs-placebo differences in published reports of controlled trials are generally moderate (Baldessarini, 2005;Gartlehner et al, 2008;Kirsch et al, 2008;Tsapakis et al, 2008;Bridge et al, 2009;Wooley et al, 2009;Masi et al, 2010;Pigott et al, 2010;Khin et al, 2011). This conclusion was reached in the previous literature despite typical reliance on initial improvement on scale ratings rather than less readily achieved clinical remission, and despite growing evidence of publication bias toward underreporting of studies without significant drugplacebo differences (Ioannidis, 2008;Turner et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is evidently widely held that differences in efficacy among specific drugs or types of antidepressants in the treatment of acute episodes of major depressive disorder are generally minor (Healy, 1997;Baldessarini, 2005Baldessarini, , 2012Cipriani et al, 2007;Gartlehner et al, 2008;Ghaemi, 2008;Pigott et al, 2010;Khin et al, 2011). The present findings support the conclusion that pooling of data from placebocontrolled trials does not yield clear rankings of specific drugs or drug-types by apparent efficacy (Figure 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The superiority of most clinically employed antidepressants over placebos in controlled trials has been modest in adult patients diagnosed with major depression, even lower in juvenile depressed patients, and probably has declined in recent years (Walsh et al, 2002;Baldessarini, 2005;Cipriani et al, 2007;Papakostas et al, 2007;Gartlehner et al, 2008;Kirsch et al, 2008;Tsapakis et al, 2008;Bridge et al, 2009;Wooley et al, 2009;Masi et al, 2010;Pigott et al, 2010;Khin et al, 2011). Evident decline in superiority of drugs over placebos has occurred despite evidence of selective reporting of positive findings of potential commercial interest from therapeutic trials (Ioannidis, 2008;Turner et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there is little evidence that one antidepressant or pharmacological class of antidepressants is clearly and convincingly more effective than others (Anderson, 2001;Baldessarini, 2005Baldessarini, , 2012Cipriani et al, 2007;Papakostas et al, 2007;Gartlehner et al, 2008;Kirsch et al, 2008;Khin et al, 2011). In part, this lack of clear differentiation may arise from the modest drug-placebo differences in many controlled trials of antidepressants, which, in turn, may reflect broad clinical heterogeneity arising from the current broad concept of 'major depression' (Healy, 1997;Ghaemi, 2008).…”
Antidepressant-placebo response-differences (RDs) in controlled trials have been declining, potentially confounding comparisons among older and newer drugs. For clinically employed antidepressants, we carried out a meta-analytic review of placebo-controlled trials in acute, unipolar, major depressive episodes reported over the past three decades to compare efficacy (drug-placebo RDs) of individual antidepressants and classes, and to consider factors associated with year-of-reporting by bivariate and multivariate regression modeling. Observed drug-placebo differences were moderate and generally similar among specific drugs, but larger among older antidepressants, notably tricyclics, than most newer agents. This outcome parallels selective increases in placebo-associated responses as trial-size has increased in recent years. Study findings generally support moderate efficacy of clinically employed antidepressants for acute major depression, but underscore limitations of meta-analyses of controlled trials for ranking drugs by efficacy. We suggest that efficiency and drug-placebo differences may be improved with fewer sites and subjects, and better quality-control of diagnostic and clinical assessments.
“…The present findings are congruent with reviews discussed above indicating that antidepressant drug-vs-placebo differences in published reports of controlled trials are generally moderate (Baldessarini, 2005;Gartlehner et al, 2008;Kirsch et al, 2008;Tsapakis et al, 2008;Bridge et al, 2009;Wooley et al, 2009;Masi et al, 2010;Pigott et al, 2010;Khin et al, 2011). This conclusion was reached in the previous literature despite typical reliance on initial improvement on scale ratings rather than less readily achieved clinical remission, and despite growing evidence of publication bias toward underreporting of studies without significant drugplacebo differences (Ioannidis, 2008;Turner et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is evidently widely held that differences in efficacy among specific drugs or types of antidepressants in the treatment of acute episodes of major depressive disorder are generally minor (Healy, 1997;Baldessarini, 2005Baldessarini, , 2012Cipriani et al, 2007;Gartlehner et al, 2008;Ghaemi, 2008;Pigott et al, 2010;Khin et al, 2011). The present findings support the conclusion that pooling of data from placebocontrolled trials does not yield clear rankings of specific drugs or drug-types by apparent efficacy (Figure 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The superiority of most clinically employed antidepressants over placebos in controlled trials has been modest in adult patients diagnosed with major depression, even lower in juvenile depressed patients, and probably has declined in recent years (Walsh et al, 2002;Baldessarini, 2005;Cipriani et al, 2007;Papakostas et al, 2007;Gartlehner et al, 2008;Kirsch et al, 2008;Tsapakis et al, 2008;Bridge et al, 2009;Wooley et al, 2009;Masi et al, 2010;Pigott et al, 2010;Khin et al, 2011). Evident decline in superiority of drugs over placebos has occurred despite evidence of selective reporting of positive findings of potential commercial interest from therapeutic trials (Ioannidis, 2008;Turner et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there is little evidence that one antidepressant or pharmacological class of antidepressants is clearly and convincingly more effective than others (Anderson, 2001;Baldessarini, 2005Baldessarini, , 2012Cipriani et al, 2007;Papakostas et al, 2007;Gartlehner et al, 2008;Kirsch et al, 2008;Khin et al, 2011). In part, this lack of clear differentiation may arise from the modest drug-placebo differences in many controlled trials of antidepressants, which, in turn, may reflect broad clinical heterogeneity arising from the current broad concept of 'major depression' (Healy, 1997;Ghaemi, 2008).…”
Antidepressant-placebo response-differences (RDs) in controlled trials have been declining, potentially confounding comparisons among older and newer drugs. For clinically employed antidepressants, we carried out a meta-analytic review of placebo-controlled trials in acute, unipolar, major depressive episodes reported over the past three decades to compare efficacy (drug-placebo RDs) of individual antidepressants and classes, and to consider factors associated with year-of-reporting by bivariate and multivariate regression modeling. Observed drug-placebo differences were moderate and generally similar among specific drugs, but larger among older antidepressants, notably tricyclics, than most newer agents. This outcome parallels selective increases in placebo-associated responses as trial-size has increased in recent years. Study findings generally support moderate efficacy of clinically employed antidepressants for acute major depression, but underscore limitations of meta-analyses of controlled trials for ranking drugs by efficacy. We suggest that efficiency and drug-placebo differences may be improved with fewer sites and subjects, and better quality-control of diagnostic and clinical assessments.
“…MDD is associated with numerous negative consequences, including health and social issues, among which suicide is the most devastating consequence attempted by as many as 8% of severe MDD patients [4]. Strikingly, only *50% of MDD patients respond to standard-of-care antidepressants [5], with *70% failing to achieve complete remission [6]. Thus, it is necessary to understand the potential mechanisms in order to explore more effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for MDD.…”
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, correlating with genetic susceptibility and environmental risk factors. Molecular, functional, and structural imaging approaches have been increasingly used to detect neurobiological changes, analyze neurochemical correlates, and parse pathophysiological mechanisms underlying MDD. We reviewed recent neuroimaging publications on MDD in terms of molecular, functional, and structural alterations as detected mainly by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography. Altered structure and function of brain regions involved in the cognitive control of affective state have been demonstrated. An abnormal default mode network, as revealed by resting-state functional MRI, is likely associated with aberrant metabolic and serotonergic function revealed by radionuclide imaging. Further multi-modal investigations are essential to clarify the characteristics of the cortical network and serotonergic system associated with behavioral and genetic variations in MDD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.