2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-016-9077-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative assessment of two ceramic cutting tools on surface roughness in hard turning of AISI H11 steel: including 2D and 3D surface topography

Abstract: This paper presents a comparison of surface roughness between both ceramic cutting tools namely, TiN coated mixed ceramic CC6050 and uncoated mixed ceramic CC650 when machining hardened hot work steel X38CrMoV5-1 [AISI H11] treated at 50 HRC. A mathematical model, relating surface roughness criteria and main factors such as cutting radius, cutting speed, feed rate, and depth of cut, was developed using response surface methodology (RSM) and its adequacy was checked by regression analysis. The effect of cutting… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variable levels of the machining parameters have been selected within the intervals by taking account the recommendations of the manufacturer of the cutting tool (Taegutec ltd.) and supported by previous work of various authors for investigating surface roughness in hard turning (Suresh and Basavarajappa 2014;Meddour et al 2015;Khellaf et al 2016). The parameters and their corresponding levels are illustrated in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The variable levels of the machining parameters have been selected within the intervals by taking account the recommendations of the manufacturer of the cutting tool (Taegutec ltd.) and supported by previous work of various authors for investigating surface roughness in hard turning (Suresh and Basavarajappa 2014;Meddour et al 2015;Khellaf et al 2016). The parameters and their corresponding levels are illustrated in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The RSM is a procedure used to determine the relationship between the independent process parameters with the desired response and exploring the effect of these parameters on responses, [19]. The experimental results of the measurement of the cutting temperature as a function of different cutting parameters are illustrated in the table 4.…”
Section: Response Surface Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical loadings (e.g. cutting force) generally introduce compressive stresses due to contact pressure, whereas thermal loading is generally associated with tensile stresses [18][19][20][21]. By against for initial measurements the stresses in both directions are compressive excepting the interval of depth between 0.7 to 0.8 mm were the residual stress are tensile.…”
Section: Response Surface Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larger approach angle produces greater feed force, but less thrust force and increasing the rake angle in the positive direction, the cutting forces are decreased while the cutting temperature increases. Khellaf et al 7 compared surface roughness in turning AISI H11 steel treated at 50 HRC between TiN coated mixed ceramic CC6050 and uncoated mixed ceramic CC650. A mathematical model relating surface roughness and machining parameters such as cutting radius, cutting speed, feed rate, and depth of cut, was developed using response surface methodology (RSM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%