2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.07.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative assessment of the effect of ultrasound treatment on protein functionality pre- and post-emulsification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The secondary structural changes of 7S and 11S fractions might have resulted from ultrasonic cavitation, which could reduce the size of protein aggregates, rearrange protein molecules at the interface, and increase the protein hydrophobicity (O'Sullivan, Beevers, Park, Greenwood, & Norton, 2015;O'Sullivan, Murray, Flynn, & Norton, 2016). A decrease in the b-sheet component showed that the protein hydrophobic interaction sites were exposed, the surface hydrophobicity of the protein was enhanced (Stathopulos et al, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The secondary structural changes of 7S and 11S fractions might have resulted from ultrasonic cavitation, which could reduce the size of protein aggregates, rearrange protein molecules at the interface, and increase the protein hydrophobicity (O'Sullivan, Beevers, Park, Greenwood, & Norton, 2015;O'Sullivan, Murray, Flynn, & Norton, 2016). A decrease in the b-sheet component showed that the protein hydrophobic interaction sites were exposed, the surface hydrophobicity of the protein was enhanced (Stathopulos et al, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This phenomenon might be attributed to the fact that the high ultrasonic power, temperature and time accelerated protein moleculars motion, increased the chance of protein moleculars collision, and rearranged protein molecules at the interface. The protein molecules which had exposed to the surface of the molecules, were buried inside the molecules (Jiang et al, 2014;O'Sullivan, Beevers, Park, Greenwood, & Norton, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acoustic power and acoustic intensity for each tip as a function of ultrasonic amplitude is additionally presented in Table 1, and was determined calorimetrically by measuring the temperature gain as a function of treatment time under adiabatic conditions. The acoustic intensity, I a (W cm -2 ), was calculated as follows [36,37]:…”
Section: Ultrasonic Processing Conditions and Vessel Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1), but showed higher emulsifying activity. This indicated that the small molecular WPI-SY complexes had greater mobility to adsorb around the oil-water interfaces (O'Sullivan et al, 2015). The average particle size in phosvitin-resveratrol system had an opposite trend with its emulsifying activity (Duan et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%