2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-13572-4_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Assessment of Temperature Based ANN and Angstrom Type Models for Predicting Global Solar Radiation

Abstract: Abstract. In this study, temperature based artificial neural network (ANN) models and Angstrom type models for predicting global solar radiation were developed for selected locations in Nigeria.The ANN models were standard multi-layered feed forward, back-propagation neural networks trained with the Levenberg Marquardt algorithm using seventeen years data collected from Nigerian Meteorological Agency (NIMET ), Abuja, Nigeria and tested with twenty-two years monthly averaged data downloaded from National Aerona… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Daily weather data (solar radiation, minimum temperature, maximum temperature, relative humidity and wind speed) as summarized in Table 1, was obtained from the archives of NASA (National Aeronautics Space Administration) Prediction of Worldwide Energy Resource, POWER (https://power.larc.nasa.gov/) for a 32-year period (July 1983-December 2015). Similar studies [ADARAMO-LA 2012;CHINEKE 2008;EGEONU et al 2015;OKUNDA-MIYA et al 2016] have adopted this method. The data was further checked for error, quality assessment, inconsistencies and missing data as recommended by World Meteorological Organization [WMO 1987] andALLEN [1996].…”
Section: Meteorological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daily weather data (solar radiation, minimum temperature, maximum temperature, relative humidity and wind speed) as summarized in Table 1, was obtained from the archives of NASA (National Aeronautics Space Administration) Prediction of Worldwide Energy Resource, POWER (https://power.larc.nasa.gov/) for a 32-year period (July 1983-December 2015). Similar studies [ADARAMO-LA 2012;CHINEKE 2008;EGEONU et al 2015;OKUNDA-MIYA et al 2016] have adopted this method. The data was further checked for error, quality assessment, inconsistencies and missing data as recommended by World Meteorological Organization [WMO 1987] andALLEN [1996].…”
Section: Meteorological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MBE and RMSE from each ET o method at each station were normalized by dividing both MBE and RMSE by the average of the PM evapotranspiration value at each station. A rank score was obtained for each method at each station by (Mubiru et al 2007, Egeonu et al 2015:…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%