2019
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-129600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Assessment of Surface CD19 and CD20 Expression on B-Cell Lymphomas from Clinical Biopsies: Implications for Targeted Therapies

Abstract: Background: CD19 and CD20 are B-cell lineage-specific antigens expressed on the cell surface of most B-cell lymphomas. While CD20 is acquired during late stages of B-cell lymphogenesis and is then lost upon differentiation into plasma cells, CD19 expression covers the entire spectrum of early B-cell genesis and maturation. CD20-targeting agents have been broadly integrated into the therapeutic armamentarium for B-cell lymphomas. More recently, CD19-targeting agents have emerged as promising alternatives with d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A multitude of factors can influence the target-binding efficiency, such as affinity of the scFv for its target, the antigen expression level on the target cell, the stability of the CAR, or even the proximal or distal position of the epitope targeted. In particular, antigen density could influence the avidity and binding of the particles and should be considered when comparing CD19- and CD20-specific binding, as expression levels vary 28 . Differences in stability or expression levels could also influence the CAR protein level displayed on the LV, potentially contributing to differential binding efficiency levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multitude of factors can influence the target-binding efficiency, such as affinity of the scFv for its target, the antigen expression level on the target cell, the stability of the CAR, or even the proximal or distal position of the epitope targeted. In particular, antigen density could influence the avidity and binding of the particles and should be considered when comparing CD19- and CD20-specific binding, as expression levels vary 28 . Differences in stability or expression levels could also influence the CAR protein level displayed on the LV, potentially contributing to differential binding efficiency levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, CD20 and CD22 have limited expression in mature B cells. Nevertheless, targeting both CD19 and CD20 has an additive effect, given CD20 antigen’s higher average density of surface molecules per tumor cell, combined with CD19’s pan B-cell lineage cell expression, with extended-expression in certain CD20-negative tumor subsets (61). Since all patients in this trial were treated with rituximab before CD20.4-1BBζ CAR T-cell administration, the question of whether CD20.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B lymphocyte antigens CD19 and CD20 are both inevitable structural components of the membranes of the majority of B cells [170]. They represent necessary components for B cell receptor (BCR) interactions and are suitable target structures both for diagnostic and therapeutic implications [171]. Given the fact that B cell malignancies such as B-NHL (B-Non-Hodgkin lymphomas) usually do not lose CD19 and CD20 expression, targeted therapies are well established for these indications [172,173].…”
Section: Targeting B Cell Surface Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%