Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COM 2017
DOI: 10.7712/120117.5643.17476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Assessment of Strut Models for the Modelling of in-Plane Seismic Response of Infill Walls

Abstract: Abstract. The influence of infills on the seismic response of frame structures has long been

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies provide diverse sets of valuable information on experimental investigations of infilled frames. However, to date, only Liberatore et al (2017) provided public access to their electronic data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These studies provide diverse sets of valuable information on experimental investigations of infilled frames. However, to date, only Liberatore et al (2017) provided public access to their electronic data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Masonry infill panels are commonly used as non-structural walls and partitions in reinforced concrete (RC) and steel frame buildings (Shing and Mehrabi, 2002). Extensive studies have been carried out to investigate the seismic behavior of masonry-infilled frames, especially the influence of frame–infill interaction on overall structural performance (Asteris et al, 2011; Liberatore et al, 2017; Noh et al, 2017). However, the design and assessment of infilled frame structures remains a challenging task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerous experimental and analytical studies were conducted over the past 60 years on the seismic response of RC structures with URM infills. These studies can be broadly classified into four categories: (1) experimental investigation and analytical modeling of infilled frames, (2) deterministic seismic assessment, (3) probabilistic seismic assessment, and (4) parametric sensitivity studies . The experience gained from the numerous experimental and analytical studies, as well as from postearthquake reconnaissance, reveals that the seismic response of URM infilled RC frames are highly uncertain, at both the component and system levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies can be broadly classified into four categories: (1) experimental investigation and analytical modeling of infilled frames, [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] (2) deterministic seismic assessment, 35 (3) probabilistic seismic assessment, [36][37][38] and (4) parametric sensitivity studies. [39][40][41][42] The experience gained from the numerous experimental and analytical studies, as well as from postearthquake reconnaissance, reveals that the seismic response of URM infilled RC frames are highly uncertain, at both the component and system levels. This is attributable to complex infill-frame interactions, inherent nonlinearity, and variability of the infill properties coupled with its strength and stiffness degradation characteristics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%