2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00703-016-0440-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative assessment of spatiotemporal snow cover changes and hydrological behavior of the Gilgit, Astore and Hunza River basins (Hindukush–Karakoram–Himalaya region, Pakistan)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
52
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
9
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Worth noting fact is that substantial reduction in the glacier melt, aside changes in precipitation that are also positive, indicates a positive change in the frozen water resources of the UIB. Such finding is largely consistent with the prevailing changes depicted from the long-term observed streamflow record ( Figure 5) and with the reports of anomalously positive or stable glacial mass balances and extents [20,22,[27][28][29]31,[33][34][35], increasing snow covers and falling end-of-summer regional snow line altitudes [20,22,25,26], and subsequent reduction in the melt season discharges [4,19]. On the other hand, a decrease in the glacier melt and in the overall discharge is in direct contrast to the reports from earlier studies, which addressing only partially the climatic uncertainty over the UIB assess its future water availability under warmer climates [5][6][7][8]90], and suggest rather enhanced glacial melt and rise in the water availability throughout the 21st century.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Worth noting fact is that substantial reduction in the glacier melt, aside changes in precipitation that are also positive, indicates a positive change in the frozen water resources of the UIB. Such finding is largely consistent with the prevailing changes depicted from the long-term observed streamflow record ( Figure 5) and with the reports of anomalously positive or stable glacial mass balances and extents [20,22,[27][28][29]31,[33][34][35], increasing snow covers and falling end-of-summer regional snow line altitudes [20,22,25,26], and subsequent reduction in the melt season discharges [4,19]. On the other hand, a decrease in the glacier melt and in the overall discharge is in direct contrast to the reports from earlier studies, which addressing only partially the climatic uncertainty over the UIB assess its future water availability under warmer climates [5][6][7][8]90], and suggest rather enhanced glacial melt and rise in the water availability throughout the 21st century.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For other main cryospheric regions of the UIB, the studies consistently report and support cooling phenomenon [4,17,19,21,27,28,30,35,36,75,76]. Over the whole UIB, increasing snow cover in a recent decade [25,26] and conflict of tree-ring based paeleoclimatic Karakoram summer temperatures with the hemispheric warming for recent five centuries [23] have also been reported.…”
Section: Prevailing Hydro-cryo-climatic Changesmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Thus, field-significant results for the whole Karakoram are mainly dominated by the contribution of relatively large number of stations from the western Karakoram. Nevertheless, reports of increasing end-ofsummer snow cover and falling regional snow line altitudes (Minora et al, 2013;Hasson et al, 2014b;Tahir et al, 2016), increasing or stable glacial extents (Hewitt, 2005;Scherler et al, 2011;Bhambri et al, 2013;Minora et al, 2013), and possibly a non-negative glacier mass balance within eastern and central Karakoram (Gardelle et al, 2013 -in contrast to a shorter period - Kääb et al, 2015), local climate change narratives (Gioli et al, 2013) and overall simulated reduced near-future water availability for the UIB (Hasson, 2016b) reinforce our presented findings.…”
Section: Water Availabilitysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…They found that the Karakoram Range received maximum precipitation at an elevation of above 5500 m, whereas high elevation (4000 m) regions generate much of the UIB's flow [5,8]. However, only a few studies, e.g., [9,10] have monitored the climatic parameters, snow and ice processes and resultant hydrological regimes at these altitudes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past few years, many studies have been conducted worldwide to assess the changing trends in temperature and rainfall for different countries such as the USA, Africa, India, Norwegian Arctic, Nepal, Northwestern Himalaya [10,[12][13][14][15], using different statistical models and methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%