2021
DOI: 10.17582/journal.aavs/2021/9.12.2176.2183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Assessment of Sensitivity and Specificity of some Diagnostic Procedures of Brucellosis using Different Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…among different animal species, particularly in northern regions [ 19 , 20 ]. B. melitensis was previously isolated from cattle, buffaloes, sheep, goats, and Nile catfish [ 19 , 21 , 22 ], while B. abortus was isolated mainly from cattle and buffaloes [ 12 , 23 , 24 ]. In our recent study, we observed an elevated seroprevalence of Brucella species in sheep and goats with a history of abortion when compared to other prevalent abortifacient protozoan agents, e.g., Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum , using indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA) [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…among different animal species, particularly in northern regions [ 19 , 20 ]. B. melitensis was previously isolated from cattle, buffaloes, sheep, goats, and Nile catfish [ 19 , 21 , 22 ], while B. abortus was isolated mainly from cattle and buffaloes [ 12 , 23 , 24 ]. In our recent study, we observed an elevated seroprevalence of Brucella species in sheep and goats with a history of abortion when compared to other prevalent abortifacient protozoan agents, e.g., Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum , using indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA) [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%