2022
DOI: 10.1002/eap.2707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative assessment of satellite‐ and drone‐based vegetation indices to predict arthropod biomass in shrub‐steppes

Abstract: This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(134 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming that vegetation indices such as BNDVI are good descriptors of arthropod biomass (i.e. food availability; Traba et al 2022), and taking into account that true diets of these species are still unknown (Zurdo et al unpubl. ), we expected this variable to be more relevant in our models, since our bird assemblage is dominated by insectivorous species, at least during the breeding season (Cramp and Simmons 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assuming that vegetation indices such as BNDVI are good descriptors of arthropod biomass (i.e. food availability; Traba et al 2022), and taking into account that true diets of these species are still unknown (Zurdo et al unpubl. ), we expected this variable to be more relevant in our models, since our bird assemblage is dominated by insectivorous species, at least during the breeding season (Cramp and Simmons 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We characterized the plots using environmental predictors that describe the habitat quality and structure through the UAV imagery. Firstly, we calculated the vegetation index BNDVI, which has previously been successfully used as a proxy of arthropod biomass (food availability, Table 1; Fernández‐Tizón et al 2020, Traba et al 2022). Secondly, we characterized the microhabitat structure in each plot through aerial images, which were used to create our environmental predictors at a 50 × 50 cm spatial scale grouped into three sets of variables: abiotic features, vegetation types and land uses (see Table 1 for the composition of the groups and the description of the variables).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At our study site, beetles are very abundant and diverse (Traba et al . 2022), with more than 15 different families. Grasshoppers are also abundant at the study site (Traba et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grasshoppers are also abundant at the study site (Traba et al . 2022), primarily diurnal (Ingrisch & Rentz 2009) and a prey with a high nutritive value (Ueckert et al . 1972, Razeng & Watson 2014), representing an important food source for numerous insectivorous and omnivorous birds (Sullins et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each plot was completely covered in a single flight to homogenize the meteorological conditions. We calculated the Blue Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (BNDVI) (Salamí et al, 2014), which has been successfully used as a proxy of arthropod biomass and hence of food availability for insectivorous birds (Traba et al, 2022). We used a set of environmental variables related to abiotic features and vegetation types to characterize the microhabitat structure in each plot through aerial images at a 50 × 50 cm spatial scale (Table 1).…”
Section: Environmental Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%