2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10499-022-00847-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative assessment of organic solvent extraction on non-specific immune defences of skin mucus from freshwater fish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be due to better environmental conditions and interaction with multiple organisms. The mucus effect varies among the species (Sridhar et al., 2022). Also, in the current study, mucus extraction effect was higher in pond fish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be due to better environmental conditions and interaction with multiple organisms. The mucus effect varies among the species (Sridhar et al., 2022). Also, in the current study, mucus extraction effect was higher in pond fish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Sridhar et al studied the effect of organic solvent extraction on skin mucus of three freshwater fishes, rohu ( Labeo rohita ), carp ( Cyprinus carpio ), and mrigal ( Cirrhinus mrigala ). Results showed that the protease activity observed in the methanol extracts of skin mucus was significantly higher than that of acetone extracts, and the methanol extract of mrigal skin mucus exhibited the highest protease activity . The resolution of this method is higher than that of salt extraction, but the extracted proteins are easily denatured and should be performed at low temperatures.…”
Section: Extraction Methods For Protein From Aquatic Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results showed that the protease activity observed in the methanol extracts of skin mucus was significantly higher than that of acetone extracts, and the methanol extract of mrigal skin mucus exhibited the highest protease activity. 23 The resolution of this method is higher than that of salt extraction, but the extracted proteins are easily denatured and should be performed at low temperatures.…”
Section: Water Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%