2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative assessment of miscibility and degradability on PET/PLA and PET/chitosan blends

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
3
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This degradation temperature was lower than that of the unmodified chitosan, as is known from our previous studies, because of the increased chitosan chain mobility and chain scission via plasma treatment . The second degradation temperature, observed at approximately 415°C, corresponded to the degradation of the PET polymer backbone units . With respect to the amount of residue at 900°C, the greatest weight loss was obtained for the PMCh/PET electrospun fibers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This degradation temperature was lower than that of the unmodified chitosan, as is known from our previous studies, because of the increased chitosan chain mobility and chain scission via plasma treatment . The second degradation temperature, observed at approximately 415°C, corresponded to the degradation of the PET polymer backbone units . With respect to the amount of residue at 900°C, the greatest weight loss was obtained for the PMCh/PET electrospun fibers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…A certain amount of ethanol was added in the system after the blend solution was standing for 5min, and the system was stirred uniformly. Before casting, the mixtures was filtered, the thickness of the film was controlled by pouring a known weight of the blend solution into a flat-bottomed glass disc [10]. The blend film was dried in vacuum oven at 40 ℃ for 48h.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A less expensive and more practical strategy to overcome these drawbacks is the blending of PLA with other polymers. Hence, several synthetic polymers and copolymers such as, polyethylene , polypropylene (PP) , polystyrene , poly(ethylene terephtalate) , polycarbonate , polyamide , and acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene (ABS) or biodegradable polymers such as polycaprolactone , poly(butylene succinate) , poly(butylenes adipate‐co‐terephtalate) , thermoplastic starch , and poly(butylene succinate adipate) have been used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%