2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12046-017-0746-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative assessment of coated and uncoated ceramic tools on cutting force components and tool wear in hard turning of AISI H11 steel using Taguchi plan and RMS

Abstract: This study investigated the cutting performance of coated CC6050 and uncoated CC650 mixed ceramics in hard turning of hardened steel. The cutting performance was mainly evaluated by cutting force components and tool wear. The planning of experiments was based on Taguchi's L 36 orthogonal array. The response surface methodology and analysis of variance were used to check the validity of multiple linear regression models and to determine the significant parameter affecting the cutting force components. Tool wear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The typical 3 D surface plot shown in Figure 9(a) illustrates the impact of two cutting variables (cutting speed and axial feed) on surface roughness (Ra). Surface roughness decreased with the rise in cutting speed possibly due to elimination of BUE formation and material side flow, 45 leading to improved surface quality as the influence of tool wear was neglected. Figure 10 shows the SEM micrograph of hard turned component having poor surface quality that explains the various topographical status.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The typical 3 D surface plot shown in Figure 9(a) illustrates the impact of two cutting variables (cutting speed and axial feed) on surface roughness (Ra). Surface roughness decreased with the rise in cutting speed possibly due to elimination of BUE formation and material side flow, 45 leading to improved surface quality as the influence of tool wear was neglected. Figure 10 shows the SEM micrograph of hard turned component having poor surface quality that explains the various topographical status.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution treated sample shows 240 HV of micro-hardness, cryogenic treated sample shows 283 HV micro-hardness and heat treated samples shows higher microhardness of 390 HV, respectively. This material is introduced for other machinability studies in the upcoming sections to know its further machinability and tool wear performance [15]. The experimental machining conditions are given in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rational choice of WEDM modes is extremely important to ensure the dimensional quality of the manufactured cutting inserts [37][38][39], while roughness of the machined surface on the cutting edge is of great importance with regards to the application of wear-resistant coatings [40][41][42][43][44], which increases tool life [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57]. During uniform charge distribution, only the side of the electrode facing the workpiece is heating up, whereas when the discharges are localized [58,59], the wire is heating up to the full depth [60].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%