2020
DOI: 10.1177/0963693520963127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative application analysis and test verification on equivalent modeling theories of honeycomb sandwich panels for satellite solar arrays

Abstract: Due to the difficulty of direct finite-element modeling for honeycomb sandwich panels, it is more common to apply equivalent modeling theories. It is necessary to compare their equivalent precision and then to determine the method with the best equivalent performance so as to prepare for the application in satellite solar arrays. The first 10 natural frequencies are obtained by analyzing the dynamic characteristics of sandwich panel theory model, honeycomb panel theory model, and equivalent panel theory model.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Park [2] in analyzing the deployment of solar panels. Honeycomb sandwich panels were modelled by Wang et al [3] with respect to different equivalent modeling theories. The linear finite-element formulation and the linear modal approach with global mode shapes were used, respectively, by Wallrapp and Wiedemann [1,4] in modeling solar panels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Park [2] in analyzing the deployment of solar panels. Honeycomb sandwich panels were modelled by Wang et al [3] with respect to different equivalent modeling theories. The linear finite-element formulation and the linear modal approach with global mode shapes were used, respectively, by Wallrapp and Wiedemann [1,4] in modeling solar panels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One three-axis stabilized spacecraft with a pair of solar arrays was modeled as a discrete dynamic model by Liu et al [7]. The accuracy of the modal approach depends on the quality of the mode shapes applied in the simulations [3]. However, neither the rigid body model nor modal order reduction method (MORM) model is adequate to express the nonlinear deformation of flexible bodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [ 15 ] used the orthotropic constitutive model of the composite honeycomb core layer to establish a two-dimensional equivalent model to predict the natural frequency and mode shapes of sandwich panels. Wang et al [ 16 ] conducted the modal test of the solar array panel to compare the honeycomb sandwich panel theory model, honeycomb panel theory model, and equivalent panel theory model, and the results show that the sandwich panel theory model has the highest equivalent accuracy. Liang et al [ 17 ] clarified the bending forming performance and forming defects of a bi-directional trapezoidal sandwich panel in detail through MPF experiment, numerical simulation, and analytical methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%