2013
DOI: 10.4161/cbt.24349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative antiproliferative effects of iniparib and olaparib on a panel of triple-negative and non-triple-negative breast cancer cell lines

Abstract: Comparative antiproliferative effects of iniparib and olaparib on a panel of triple-negative and non-triple-negative breast cancer cell lines, Cancer Biology & Therapy, 14:6, 537-545,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(66 reference statements)
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, neratinib was also shown to enhance response when added to mammalian target of rapamycin/phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase inhibitors47 and the PARP inhibitor olaparib 48. These results, as well as those of the study from Seyhan et al28 point to the potential added benefit of using neratinib as a combinational treatment option alongside other targeted treatments as well as conventional chemotherapeutics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Additionally, neratinib was also shown to enhance response when added to mammalian target of rapamycin/phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase inhibitors47 and the PARP inhibitor olaparib 48. These results, as well as those of the study from Seyhan et al28 point to the potential added benefit of using neratinib as a combinational treatment option alongside other targeted treatments as well as conventional chemotherapeutics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Five of the sporadic BLC cell lines (MDA MB 231, MDA MB 468, BT20, HCC1143, and HS578T), one of the BRCA1 mutant lines (HCC1937), and the three non-BLC cell lines (MCF7, SKBR3, and T47D) tested in our work were assayed in the PARP study (65). The results are difficult to interpret without comparing the lines to a normal breast control cell line, but there was no uniformity in PARP inhibitor sensitivity among the different subtypes from these data (65). Thus, on the basis of that work, it also appears that not all BRCA1 mutant genotypes and breast tumor subtype designations are effective predictors of sensitivity to PARP inhibitors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, sporadic BLCs have failed after treatment with single agents (62,64) and PARP inhibitor/antiangiogenic therapy combinations (63). We did not test our entire cell line panel for PARP inhibitor sensitivity, because most of the cell lines, along with others representing different subtypes, have already been tested for sensitivity to two different PARP inhibitors (65). Five of the sporadic BLC cell lines (MDA MB 231, MDA MB 468, BT20, HCC1143, and HS578T), one of the BRCA1 mutant lines (HCC1937), and the three non-BLC cell lines (MCF7, SKBR3, and T47D) tested in our work were assayed in the PARP study (65).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A Phase III trial statistics for this combination predicted a probability of success of 90% 41. Combined treatment with olaparib and either the CDK1 inhibitor (RO-3306) or a pan HER inhibitor (neratinib, afatinib) resulted in superior growth inhibition compared to that obtained with olaparib alone 40. Although better patient stratification is likely to improve therapeutic outcome, several PARP inhibitor resistance mechanisms in BRCA-associated tumors have been proposed 42.…”
Section: The Target and The Treatment Of Tnbcmentioning
confidence: 99%