Comparative Antimicrobial Efficacy of Two Hand Sanitizers in Intensive Care Units Common Areas: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Contaminated hands of healthcare workers (HCWs) are an important source of transmission of healthcare-associated infections. Alcohol-based hand sanitizers, while effective, do not provide sustained antimicrobial activity. The objective of this study was to compare the immediate and persistent activity of 2 hand hygiene products (ethanol [61% w/v] plus chlorhexidine gluconate [CHG; 1.0% solution] and ethanol only [70% v/v]) when used in an intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, crossover study SETTING Three ICUs at a large teaching hospital PARTICIPANTS In total, 51 HCWs involved in direct patient care were enrolled in and completed the study. METHODS All HCWs were randomized 1:1 to either product. Hand prints were obtained immediately after the product was applied and again after spending 4-7 minutes in the ICU common areas prior to entering a patient room or leaving the area. The numbers of aerobic colony-forming units (CFU) were compared for the 2 groups after log transformation. Each participant tested the alternative product after a 3-day washout period. RESULTS On bare hands, use of ethanol plus CHG was associated with significantly lower recovery of aerobic CFU, both immediately after use (0.27 ± 0.05 and 0.88 ± 0.08 log10 CFU; P = .035) and after spending time in ICU common areas (1.81 ± 0.07 and 2.17 ± 0.05 log10 CFU; P<.0001). Both the antiseptics were well tolerated by HCWs. CONCLUSIONS In comparison to the ethanol-only product, the ethanol plus CHG sanitizer was associated with significantly lower aerobic bacterial counts on hands of HCWs, both immediately after use and after spending time in ICU common areas. CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02258412 Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:267-271.

Multidrug-resistant organisms on patients hands in an ICU setting

“…Similarly, when 357 newly admitted patients in postacute-care facilities hands were swabbed, 24% of patients had at least 1 MDRO, and another 10% had acquired an MDRO during their stay. 5,9 The difference in prevalence of MDROs between our study and prior studies may be because of our focus on ICU patients, who underwent daily chlorhexidine bathing per protocol. Previous studies have also demonstrated a potential relationship between patient hand contamination and contamination of high-touch room surfaces.…”

Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizers in COVID-19 Prevention: A Multidimensional Perspective

“…Unlike alcohols, these ingredients are not volatile and hence antimicrobial activity can persist for longer periods [24]. Chlorhexidine is an example of an antimicrobial agent which has been combined with alcohol in some ABHS products [25,26] although its additional benefit has been questioned [27,28]. The use of such combinations is uncommon and may be restricted to ABHS employed in health care settings in some countries.…”

Greener options – a guide to hand sanitisers

“…Most alcohol-based hand sanitisers contain ingredients to prevent dryness as well as ingredients to help rehydrate the skin. Ensuring ingredients such as glycerol and aloe vera are present in sanitisers would therefore be very beneficial to practice staff 11…”

“…Ensuring ingredients such as glycerol and aloe vera are present in sanitisers would therefore be very beneficial to practice staff. 11…”