2017
DOI: 10.3171/2016.8.jns16403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative anatomical analysis of the transcallosal-transchoroidal and transcallosal-transforniceal-transchoroidal approaches to the third ventricle

Abstract: OBJECTIVE Access to the third ventricle is a veritable challenge to neurosurgeons. In this context, anatomical and morphometric studies are useful for establishing the limitations and advantages of a particular surgical approach. The transchoroidal approach is versatile and provides adequate exposure of the middle and posterior regions of the third ventricle. However, the fornix column limits the exposure of the anterior region of the third ventricle. There is evidence that the unilateral section of the fornix… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(55 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In parallel with our findings,several studies have demonstrated the preference of these routes for surgical removal of intra-third ventricular CP with or without extension to the suprasellar region [16] [49] [53]. However, Joao et al argued that the transcallosal-transchoroidal approach offers a greater working space in the third ventricle than that afforded by the transchoroidal approach [54]. Contrary to tradition, in our series, three patients with intra-third ventricular CP were operated using the TS with good recovery but only one patient had recurrence after 12 months and was retreated by pterional approach, a feat similarly reported by Coppen and group [55].…”
Section: Selection Of the Operative Approachsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In parallel with our findings,several studies have demonstrated the preference of these routes for surgical removal of intra-third ventricular CP with or without extension to the suprasellar region [16] [49] [53]. However, Joao et al argued that the transcallosal-transchoroidal approach offers a greater working space in the third ventricle than that afforded by the transchoroidal approach [54]. Contrary to tradition, in our series, three patients with intra-third ventricular CP were operated using the TS with good recovery but only one patient had recurrence after 12 months and was retreated by pterional approach, a feat similarly reported by Coppen and group [55].…”
Section: Selection Of the Operative Approachsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…[ 10 ] The trajectory is selected based on tumor characteristics (location, origin, extension, vascular supply, and size), suspected diagnosis, clinical findings, hydrocephalus, and surgical experience. [ 10 48 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It offers a minimized option for unobstructed direct access to tumors in the anterolateral skull base permitting the use of different vantage points and working angles. [3][4][5][6]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%