2022
DOI: 10.3765/salt.v31i0.5091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Anaphora: comparing alternatives

Abstract: A common assumption in degree semantics is that there is a functionargumentrelationship betwen the comparative morpheme er and the overt standard.Drawing on observations from comparatives without an overt standard, I argue forreconsiderations of this assumption and offer a reanalysis of er, where it directlycompares to the alternative in the second dimension of meaning.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Alternative comparisons 4.1 The baseline re-analysis of comparatives Li (2022) proposes that comparatives always compare two things of the same type (i.e. two alternatives) on a locally derived measurement dimension (cf.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Alternative comparisons 4.1 The baseline re-analysis of comparatives Li (2022) proposes that comparatives always compare two things of the same type (i.e. two alternatives) on a locally derived measurement dimension (cf.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%