2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis on the nanoindentation of polymers using atomic force microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
116
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
16
116
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Two well-characterised materials, that is, Poly(methyl methacrylate) -(PMMA); and Polystyrene -(PP) were measured and analysed with the exact same experimental procedure used for the bone samples. The analysis of the results for both materials returned the values of 4.5 ± 0.14 and 1.36 ± 0.02 GPa for the PMMA and PP respectively, which are similar to the values reported in the literature for these materials (Jee and Lee, 2010;Pukánszky et al, 1997), when measured using conventional nanoindentation (5.2 ± 0.5 and 2.0 ± 0.4 GPa for PMMA and PP respectively; data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Two well-characterised materials, that is, Poly(methyl methacrylate) -(PMMA); and Polystyrene -(PP) were measured and analysed with the exact same experimental procedure used for the bone samples. The analysis of the results for both materials returned the values of 4.5 ± 0.14 and 1.36 ± 0.02 GPa for the PMMA and PP respectively, which are similar to the values reported in the literature for these materials (Jee and Lee, 2010;Pukánszky et al, 1997), when measured using conventional nanoindentation (5.2 ± 0.5 and 2.0 ± 0.4 GPa for PMMA and PP respectively; data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…(1) at the maximum depth of penetration in the initial elastic response of the unloading curve (Fischer-Cripps, 2000;Jee & Lee, 2010), as it is shown in the inset of Fig. 5a.…”
Section: Nanoindentation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Indeed, the indentation depth should be deep enough to minimize the surface effect. Meanwhile, the indentation depth should also be less than 10% of the film thickness when the sample is mounted on a hard substance; otherwise the obtained value is usually larger than the amount it should be, due to the effect of the support [41]. Therefore, the maximum indentation depth in our experiments was limited to 250 nm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%