2020
DOI: 10.26452/ijrps.v11ispl3.2909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of various obturation techniques in mandibular molars: A retrospective clinical outcome study

Abstract: The primary objective of root canal treatment is the ability to remove irritants, to clean, shape and fill the root canal system three-dimensionally and prevent recontamination from bacterial irritants. Various Obturation techniques used for filling the root canals include lateral condensation, vertical compression, and thermoplastic gutta-percha techniques. The retrospective study aimed to evaluate the various obturation techniques used in mandibular molars. For this retrospective study data collection was ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these, 255 were excluded because of being duplicates. From the analysis of the titles and abstracts of 225 eligible articles, 20 studies were selected for full-text reading [ 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 ]. Of these, nine studies were excluded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of these, 255 were excluded because of being duplicates. From the analysis of the titles and abstracts of 225 eligible articles, 20 studies were selected for full-text reading [ 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 ]. Of these, nine studies were excluded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, nine studies were excluded. Four studies due to sample overlap (data used in more than one study); 2 studies for not having assessed periapical healing; 1 study for not having an experimental group; 1 study for including data on retreatments; and 1 study for not having evaluated obturation techniques [ 31 32 33 36 40 41 43 46 49 ]. Finally, 11 studies were included in the current systematic review [ 30 34 35 37 38 39 42 44 45 47 48 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%