2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.01.158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of variation in macroscopic design process parameters of triboelectric nanogenerators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The triboelectric nanogenerators have advantages such as simple structural configurations, a wide range of triboelectric materials, an easy operating mechanism, a simple fabrication process, a high output performance, and non-complex signal processing [13][14][15]. The output power of TENGs depends on charge densities and dimensions of selected triboelectric materials and the operating mode frequency [16][17][18]. Most TENGs have only employed inorganic materials as triboelectric materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The triboelectric nanogenerators have advantages such as simple structural configurations, a wide range of triboelectric materials, an easy operating mechanism, a simple fabrication process, a high output performance, and non-complex signal processing [13][14][15]. The output power of TENGs depends on charge densities and dimensions of selected triboelectric materials and the operating mode frequency [16][17][18]. Most TENGs have only employed inorganic materials as triboelectric materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%