2010
DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2009.00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of Two-Piece Extended Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters with Remote Exit-Site Locations and Conventional Abdominal Catheters

Abstract: Extended catheters enable peritoneal access for patients in whom conventional catheter placement would be difficult or impossible. Certain patient and extended-catheter characteristics may contribute to loss from peritonitis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In a prospective nonrandomized study, 2-piece extended catheters, which permit pre-sternal exit site away from problematic abdominal conditions, was compared to conventional catheters (62). The result showed that although extended catheters enabled peritoneal access for patients in whom conventional catheter placement would be difficult or impossible, they were associated with a higher risk of relapsing peritonitis episodes, especially those caused by coagulase-negative staphylococcal species (62).…”
Section: Catheter Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a prospective nonrandomized study, 2-piece extended catheters, which permit pre-sternal exit site away from problematic abdominal conditions, was compared to conventional catheters (62). The result showed that although extended catheters enabled peritoneal access for patients in whom conventional catheter placement would be difficult or impossible, they were associated with a higher risk of relapsing peritonitis episodes, especially those caused by coagulase-negative staphylococcal species (62).…”
Section: Catheter Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,12 Similarly, there was no significant association of the outcomes with weight or body mass index, although the available literature shows equivocal findings in this respect. [13][14][15] However, as can be judged from Tables 2 and 3, swan neck angle category was associated with body size, and inclination was related to body size and history of abdominal surgery. From this, it can be interpreted that proper positioning of a PD catheter in the abdominal wall is a greater challenge in obese patients and patients with a history of abdominal surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding whether obesity directly increases the risk of PD-related infection is important because, if such is the case, then changing the location of the exit site to a presternal location might be of benefit (9)(10)(11). If, however, obesity is simply a marker of peritonitis risk, then the factors associated with obesity that are contributing to the development of CNS peritonitis should instead be targeted.…”
Section: Obesity and Pd-related Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%