2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-018-4456-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of three methods from dried blood spots for expeditious DNA extraction from mosquitoes; suitable for PCR based techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that DNA fragmentation, similar to DNA strandedness, is also affected by factors such as storage and original sample conditions, in addition to sample type and applied DNA extraction protocol. While numerous studies have shown that Chelex-based extraction protocols are cost-effective with similar or better performance compared to commercially available kits [6, 52, 73-78], concerns have been raised whether Chelex-based extracts provide adequate DNA stability for long-term storage [79]. The high pH (10-11) of the Chelex solution has been shown to decrease over time [80], and the chelating effect of the Chelex resin, removing metal cations required for DNase activity, may also decline over time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that DNA fragmentation, similar to DNA strandedness, is also affected by factors such as storage and original sample conditions, in addition to sample type and applied DNA extraction protocol. While numerous studies have shown that Chelex-based extraction protocols are cost-effective with similar or better performance compared to commercially available kits [6, 52, 73-78], concerns have been raised whether Chelex-based extracts provide adequate DNA stability for long-term storage [79]. The high pH (10-11) of the Chelex solution has been shown to decrease over time [80], and the chelating effect of the Chelex resin, removing metal cations required for DNase activity, may also decline over time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It chelates metal ions that are crucial for the activity of nucleases . Chelex‐100 has been widely used for simplified DNA extraction from a great number of biological and non‐biological samples such as carbonized and decomposing corpse, mosquito abdomen, cigarette butts, semen, bloodstain and buccal swab, which produce varying DNA yield and quality. In our case, the use of Chelex‐100 neither in water nor in Tris‐buffer did not contribute to the efficiency of cell lysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, extraction of samples with an organic solvent such as chloroform and their precipitation with ethanol allow to obtain DNA that can be used for SNP-RFLP genotyping studies. Previous studies developed similar extraction methods for detection and genotyping of parasites [12,13], but the advantage of our method is the ability to obtain signi cant quantities of DNA, in fact mean DNA yields are 2-3 µg, a result until now obtained with commercial kits [14,15]. In 2018, Panda et al compared three methods for DNA extraction from mosquitoes dried blood spots: Chelex-100, QIAamp DNA mini kit, and TE (Tris EDTA)-Buffer, obtaining the lowest yield with TE buffer method [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies developed similar extraction methods for detection and genotyping of parasites [12,13], but the advantage of our method is the ability to obtain signi cant quantities of DNA, in fact mean DNA yields are 2-3 µg, a result until now obtained with commercial kits [14,15]. In 2018, Panda et al compared three methods for DNA extraction from mosquitoes dried blood spots: Chelex-100, QIAamp DNA mini kit, and TE (Tris EDTA)-Buffer, obtaining the lowest yield with TE buffer method [13]. The TE buffer-based DNA extraction method described here has instead shown better results, compared with traditional protocols.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%