2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2015.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of the gastrointestinal microbial communities of bar-headed goose (Anser indicus) in different breeding patterns by high-throughput sequencing

Abstract: The bar-headed goose is currently one of the most popular species for rare birds breeding in China. However, bar-headed geese in captivity display a reduced reproductive rate. The gut microbiome has been shown to influence host factors such as nutrient and energy metabolism, immune homeostasis and reproduction. It is therefore of great scientific and agriculture value to analyze the microbial communities associated with bar-headed geese in order to improve their reproductive rate. Here we describe the first co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
37
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
9
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also observed that species richness and diversity of the gut microbiota between wild and farmed Swan geese were not statistically different. This contrasts with our previously published results that the semi-artificially reared Bar-headed geese had higher species richness and diversity than the wild ones [39]. We speculate that this lack of difference may be due to the rearing environments that more closely simulate the natural conditions, in which farmed Swan geese were allowed to forage freely and were fed on both natural and artificial foods.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…We also observed that species richness and diversity of the gut microbiota between wild and farmed Swan geese were not statistically different. This contrasts with our previously published results that the semi-artificially reared Bar-headed geese had higher species richness and diversity than the wild ones [39]. We speculate that this lack of difference may be due to the rearing environments that more closely simulate the natural conditions, in which farmed Swan geese were allowed to forage freely and were fed on both natural and artificial foods.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…At the phylum level, Firmicutes , Proteobacteria, and Fusobacteria were found to be present at high abundance in each sample. Firmicutes and Proteobacteria , the most widespread intestinal phyla, are commonly observed within gut environments of many birds (Waite & Taylor, ; Wang, Cao, Li, et al., ; Wang, Cao, Yang, et al., ; Wang, Zheng, et al., ). Members of these two phyla were frequently studied for their food digestion roles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biggest problem of bar-headed geese artificial breeding is the low egg-laying rate, which limit the number of eggs for artificial incubation. Our previous comparative study on the different bar-headed geese breeding patterns has shown that marked differences in gut microbiota existed between wild and farmed bar-headed geese (Wang et al 2016). Considering that gut microbiome may be a crucial factor in the regulation of reproduction, we try to figure out the core gut microbes of bar-headed geese at a wide range of scales.…”
Section: Original Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%