2019 International Conference on Advancements in Computing (ICAC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icac49085.2019.9103428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of the application of Deep Learning techniques for Forex Rate prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is a trade-off between computation time and prediction performance of LSTM versus Bi-LSTM approaches, the differences in computation time are not significant. Moreover, the proposed three layers Bi-LSTM networks could achieve similar prediction performance results compared to other machine learning and deep learning methods that used deeper network's architecture, as reported in Aryal et al [32] who used LSTM, convolutional neural networks (CNN), and temporal convolution networks (TCN); Qi et al [33] who used RNN, LSTM, Bi-LSTM, and gated recurrent unit (GRU); and Dautel et al [34] who employed FNN, RNN, LSTM, and GRU. Moreover, we could also try to compare the prediction results from this study with other Machine and Deep Learning methods commonly used in the literature, such as naïve Bayes [35], GRU [36], and Random Forest Regressor [37], a popular tree-based algorithm.…”
Section: Performance Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Although there is a trade-off between computation time and prediction performance of LSTM versus Bi-LSTM approaches, the differences in computation time are not significant. Moreover, the proposed three layers Bi-LSTM networks could achieve similar prediction performance results compared to other machine learning and deep learning methods that used deeper network's architecture, as reported in Aryal et al [32] who used LSTM, convolutional neural networks (CNN), and temporal convolution networks (TCN); Qi et al [33] who used RNN, LSTM, Bi-LSTM, and gated recurrent unit (GRU); and Dautel et al [34] who employed FNN, RNN, LSTM, and GRU. Moreover, we could also try to compare the prediction results from this study with other Machine and Deep Learning methods commonly used in the literature, such as naïve Bayes [35], GRU [36], and Random Forest Regressor [37], a popular tree-based algorithm.…”
Section: Performance Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The sliding window technique involves partitioning a time series data sequence into two segments: the initial segment serves as the input window values, while the subsequent segment represents the predicted values [31]. This iterative process advances step by step, shifting one step at a time through the dataset, acquiring multiple samples from the training set.…”
Section: Sliding Window Methods (Time Steps)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a proposed new CNN architecture incorporates a modular topology inspired by Tzilivaki et al [50], formulating a convolutional, orthogonal recurrent MCD replacing the pooling layers, followed by dense layers flattening their outputs. Compared with a typical CNN time series composed of convolutional, pooling, flattened, and dense layers, the proposed new CNN could enhance the robustness and forecasting performance of the Forex market [79].…”
Section: Proposed Novel Bio-inspired Model In Predicted Forex Market ...mentioning
confidence: 99%