Comparative Analysis of SVM, XGBoost and Neural Network on Hate Speech Classification

Liang, Suwarno

doi:10.29207/resti.v5i5.3506

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The analysis results that researchers have done get SVM results higher than XGBoost and ANN. The results are 83.2% with SVM, 76.6% with XGBoost, and 82.9 with ANN [14].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Sentiment Analysis of Hate Speech on Twitter Public Figures with AdaBoost and XGBoost Methods

Suhendra

Jondri

Indwiarti

2022

mib

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Public figures are often scrutinized by social media users, either because of what they say or even because of their role in a television series. Generally, public figures upload something on their social media accounts to help shape their image. But not everyone who sees it is happy. Some even dislike the upload. This study aims to determine public sentiment towards public figure Anya Geraldine conveyed on Twitter in Indonesian. The classification process in this study uses the Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) classification methods with text preprocessing using cleaning, case folding, tokenization, and filtering. The data used are tweets in Indonesian with the keyword ”@anyaselalubenar”, with a total dataset of 7,475 tweets divided into 6,887 positive and 588 negative tweets. From the label results using oversampling to avoid excessive overfitting problems. The feature used is TF-IDF weighting. Four experimental scenarios were carried out to validate the effectiveness of the model used: first model performance without oversampling, second model performance with oversampling, third model performance with undersampling, and fourth model performance with Hyperparameter tune. The experimental results show that XGBoost+SMOTE+Hyperparameter achieved 95% compared to AdaBoost+SMOTE+Hyperparameter of 87%. The application of SMOTE and Hyperparameter tune is proven to overcome the problem of data imbalance and get better classification results.

show abstract

“…The analysis results that researchers have done get SVM results higher than XGBoost and ANN. The results are 83.2% with SVM, 76.6% with XGBoost, and 82.9 with ANN [14].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 94%