2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of statistical methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Bostanlik District, Uzbekistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, numerous methods exist for landslide susceptibility mapping. They range from qualitative models (inventory-based and knowledge-driven methods) to quantitative models (data-driven methods and deterministic methods) (Juliev et al, 2018;Zêzere et al, 2017). The qualitative methods are mainly based on expert's opinion, and they include magnitude frequency, active mapping, Boolean logic, and fuzzy logic (Abella & Van Westen, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, numerous methods exist for landslide susceptibility mapping. They range from qualitative models (inventory-based and knowledge-driven methods) to quantitative models (data-driven methods and deterministic methods) (Juliev et al, 2018;Zêzere et al, 2017). The qualitative methods are mainly based on expert's opinion, and they include magnitude frequency, active mapping, Boolean logic, and fuzzy logic (Abella & Van Westen, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on landslide studies confirms that different models used to predict landslide susceptibility have been widely compared globally (Chen et al, 2018a;Juliev et al, 2018). Qualitative models and data-driven models-namely, statistical methodswere explored and compared to study landslide susceptibility for different regional scales (Dou et al, 2018;Van Den Eeckhaut, Marre, & Poesen, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the abovementioned indices, elevation, topography, and slope are closely related to the DEM data [24]. In the majority of the previous studies, it has been suggested that DEM data should be consistent with the study date [25][26][27][28][29]. However, because of landscape changes and reshaping processes (e.g., earthquakes and engineering construction), the DEM data usually show obvious temporal variation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…SWARA-ANFIS-PSO appeared to be six times faster with respect to the processing time attained by SWARA-ANFIS-SFLA . Mukhiddin Juliev et al (2019) compared Statistical Index (SI), Frequency Ratio (FR) and Certainty Factor (CF) for landslide susceptibility mapping. Using assessment methods, they concluded that the statistical index method has the best performance in their study (Juliev et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mukhiddin Juliev et al (2019) compared Statistical Index (SI), Frequency Ratio (FR) and Certainty Factor (CF) for landslide susceptibility mapping. Using assessment methods, they concluded that the statistical index method has the best performance in their study (Juliev et al, 2019). Nsengiyumva et al (2019) used weights of evidence, logistic regression, frequency ratio and statistical index to produce susceptibility maps for Rwanda area in Africa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%