2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of salvage partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy after the failure of initial partial nephrectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall complication rate for repeat robotic or laparoscopic PN increased from 17.6% to 42% [4] , [6] , with the incidence of major complications (defined as Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III) as high as 10% [8] . One of the most common sPN complications was bleeding, with incidence ranging from 5.6% to 23% [4] and a blood transfusion rate of 5.9% [4] , [9] , [10] . In addition, the difficulty in dissecting the renal hilum increased the rate of conversion to an off-clamp technique, which can lead to excessive bleeding during tumor resection [4] , [9] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall complication rate for repeat robotic or laparoscopic PN increased from 17.6% to 42% [4] , [6] , with the incidence of major complications (defined as Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III) as high as 10% [8] . One of the most common sPN complications was bleeding, with incidence ranging from 5.6% to 23% [4] and a blood transfusion rate of 5.9% [4] , [9] , [10] . In addition, the difficulty in dissecting the renal hilum increased the rate of conversion to an off-clamp technique, which can lead to excessive bleeding during tumor resection [4] , [9] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nephron-sparing surgery represents a surgical approach endorsed in the clinical treatment paradigm for renal tumors. This technique adeptly conserves the patient’s nephron while concurrently extending their survival duration to a significant degree ( 3 , 4 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%