2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01181-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in severely obese patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, 35 studies met our criteria (Fig. 1), and they contained 426,463 obese patients, including 398,169 patients who adopted LRYGB and 28,294 patients who adopted RRYGB 10–44 . 18 studies stated that they adopted robotic-assisted procedures, and 7 studies adopted full robotic procedures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, 35 studies met our criteria (Fig. 1), and they contained 426,463 obese patients, including 398,169 patients who adopted LRYGB and 28,294 patients who adopted RRYGB 10–44 . 18 studies stated that they adopted robotic-assisted procedures, and 7 studies adopted full robotic procedures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of new technology, such as robotic surgery, studies showing modest benefits are frequent, and they rarely include the investment required, such as capital purchase, maintenance, and training [ 63 , 64 ]. As stated some years ago “As the use of robotic technology in colon surgery continues to evolve, critical appraisal of the benefits offered in comparison with the resources consumed is required.” [ 65 ].…”
Section: Evidence Of Benefitmentioning
confidence: 99%