Comparative Analysis of Rainfall Prediction Models Using Machine Learning in Islands with Complex Orography: Tenerife Island

Abstract

We present a comparative study between predictive monthly rainfall models for islands of complex orography using machine learning techniques. The models have been developed for the island of Tenerife (Canary Islands). Weather forecasting is influenced both by the local geographic characteristics as well as by the time horizon comprised. Accuracy of mid-term rainfall prediction on islands with complex orography is generally low when carried out with atmospheric models. Predictive models based on algorithms such as Random Forest or Extreme Gradient Boosting among others were analyzed. The predictors used in the models include weather predictors measured in two main meteorological stations, reanalysis predictors from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the global predictor North Atlantic Oscillation, all of them obtained over a period of time of more than four decades. When comparing the proposed models, we evaluated accuracy, kappa and interpretability of the model obtained, as well as the relevance of the predictors used. The results show that global predictors such as the North Atlantic Oscillation Index (NAO) have a very low influence, while the local Geopotential Height (GPH) predictor is relatively more important. Machine learning prediction models are a relevant proposition for predicting medium-term precipitation in similar geographical regions.

Basic Statistical Estimation Outperforms Machine Learning in Monthly Prediction of Seasonal Climatic Parameters

“…This procedure disrupts the integrity of the data by causing data leakage, whereby information from the testing set is introduced into the training set. Other papers make no attempt to account for seasonality [18,22,23,46,48,61,68,69]. Evidently, there is no consistent procedure for dealing with the seasonality aspect of the data; this is one point that we address in this paper.…”

“…Another concern is that some common pre-processing practices produce data leakage, so that ML algorithm accuracies are over-reported. Some examples of such practices are: data shuffling, whereby researchers randomly shuffle the data [11,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]; data imputation methods that use statistics (such as averaging) calculated on the entire data set, including both training and testing [24][25][26]; and data transformations such as de-seasonalization that also use statistics calculated on the whole dataset [27,28].…”

Model Evaluation for Forecasting Traffic Accident Severity in Rainy Seasons Using Machine Learning Algorithms: Seoul City Study

“…There was also an attempt to forecast bus ridership at the stop and stop-to-stop levels and vehicle traffic flow prediction including delay with the development of a deep learning architecture [29][30][31]. In addition, a rainfall prediction model was developed by a machine learning algorithm [32].…”

Augmented Data and XGBoost Improvement for Sales Forecasting in the Large-Scale Retail Sector

“…In [12] XGBoost algorithm was used in order to obtain weather predictions, such as medium-term precipitation prediction, while the authors of [13] used the XGBoost approach for predicting the short-term power consumption in rural and residential areas. The research studies [14,15] use an XGBoost-based model for deterministic wind power forecasting.…”

“…The n_jobs = −1 option, permitting one to use all CPU cores, saves time, especially for trees that use a large number of nodes. Parallel computing is widely used in various sectors [12,[53][54][55] because it optimizes computational costs.…”