Comparative Analysis of Planning with the Critical Path Method, Last Planner System, and Location-Based Techniques in Brazil, Finland, and the United States

Abstract

The Critical Path Method (CPM), the Last Planner System (LPS) and location-based methods, such as the Line of Balance (LB) are discussed extensively in the technical literature about schedules. However, no discussion exists focusing on the differences and similarities of these methods in terms of their use in different countries. Using chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests, this research compared three countries (Brazil, Finland, and United States) and the methods to evaluate both intra-and inter-country implementation to gain additional insights about their use.Results suggest statistically significant intra-and inter-country differences regarding how these methods are used, with a specific focus on mechanics in the countries, offering important information to address their various scheduling needs. The results reflect the current state of practice; engineering and construction managers should understand different ways of understanding scheduling. Such understanding can lead to more efficient communication with collaborators and when incorporating foreign teams in projects. The study identifies the need for further scientific explanation as to why these methods are used in the manner they are intracountry as well as adaptions made in inter-country relationships.

The PICO Framework for Analysis and Design of Production Systems for Construction

“…. Among operating system tools, there are the Critical Path Method (CPM), Location-based Management Systems (LBMS), Last Planner System (LPS), Virtual Design and Construction (VDC), pull methods, Takt scheduling, and combinations of them (Kenley and Seppänen 2009;Scala et al 2022).…”

Lean System-Based Tool for Housing Projects Management in the Pandemic Period

“…While this study focusses on implementing a suitable tool to be adopted easily by the labour who are directly involved in the construction, analysis of the various setbacks of achieving the goal of implementing the Lean tool should pave a better path not only by means of adopting the Lean principle, but by reaping the benefits of totally solving the setbacks developed by the various stakeholders during the stages of Lean tool implementation [2].…”