Comparative Analysis of Move-Specific Lexical Bundles in Linguistics Dissertation Abstracts: A Study of Students from China and the United States

Abstract

This article compared three-word move-specific lexical bundles (MLBs) in dissertation abstracts authored by linguistics doctoral students from China and the United States. Two separate corpora were constructed for analysis: (1) The China Linguistics PhD Abstracts Corpus (CLC), consisting of 700 abstracts totaling 613,713 words generated by doctoral students from China specializing in linguistics, and (2) the America Linguistics PhD Abstracts Corpus (ALC), comprising 700 abstracts totaling 247,359 words written by American doctoral students in linguistics. The identification of MLBs was based on log-likelihood values, indicating a notably higher number of instances within a specific move in contrast to the overall corpus. The study then proceeded to compare the structures, functions, and communicative purposes of MLBs in the two corpora. The findings of the analysis are as follows: (1) Chinese students employed a higher percentage of NP- and PP-based MLBs but a lower proportion of VP-based MLBs, and both groups used different words within similar structures; (2) Chinese students employed a higher percentage of research- and participant-oriented MLBs but a lower proportion of text-oriented MLBs, and the two groups used dissimilar MLBs to fulfill similar functions; and (3) the two groups employed distinct MLBs to achieve identical communicative purposes, with Chinese students utilizing MLBs specific to the CLC corpus. These findings highlight the pedagogical significance of MLBs and underscore the importance of corpus linguistics in identifying and teaching essential move-specific vocabulary to second/foreign language learners.

Advancing Graduate Academic English Teaching: Analyzing Lexical Bundles in Photonics Research Article Abstracts

“…This approach was complemented by Li et al's (2020, p. 87) bundle-driven methodology, where "the generation of bundles came first," and the rhetorical moves in abstracts "emerged from the classification of the generated bundles." Additionally, the strategy incorporated insights from Bao and Liu's (2023) research, which, while anchored in the five-move model, extends the identification of communicative purposes beyond this framework. For example, their analysis of the background move revealed that certain bundles, such as the importance of, predominantly articulate research significance, thereby contributing to the overarching aim of setting the research context.…”

Comparative Analysis of Lexical Bundles in Dissertation Abstracts: Insights for Teaching Academic English to Chinese Students

“…The scope of research on lexical bundles in academic writing has largely focused on those found in research article abstracts, leaving a notable gap in the study of dissertation abstracts (Bao, 2022;2023;Lu and Deng, 2019). This gap is significant as research article abstracts and dissertation abstracts are two distinct genres, each characterized by their own rhetorical structures and linguistic styles (El-Dakhs, 2018).…”