2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-49695-1_32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of Mission Planning and Execution Times Between the Microsoft HoloLens and the Surface Touch Table

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2017, the US Army released "TAR (tactical augmented reality)," a concept system of individual soldier tactical augmented reality that focuses more on indoor environments [64]. In 2019, the US Army released a militaryintegrated visual augmentation system "IVAS (integrated visual augmentation system)" based on the augmented reality glasses device HoloLens2, which can see the threedimensional map of the scene superimposed on the real environment showing the location of the enemy and friend through the AR glasses and can realize the function of updating the map in real time with the position and posture of the glasses [65].…”
Section: Wireless Communications and Mobile Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2017, the US Army released "TAR (tactical augmented reality)," a concept system of individual soldier tactical augmented reality that focuses more on indoor environments [64]. In 2019, the US Army released a militaryintegrated visual augmentation system "IVAS (integrated visual augmentation system)" based on the augmented reality glasses device HoloLens2, which can see the threedimensional map of the scene superimposed on the real environment showing the location of the enemy and friend through the AR glasses and can realize the function of updating the map in real time with the position and posture of the glasses [65].…”
Section: Wireless Communications and Mobile Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graphically representing military decision-making strategies at all levels of operations requires new visualization approaches that can be applied to dynamic environments characterized by changing rules, cognitive states, uncertainty, and individual biases and heuristics ( Dennison et al, 2020 ; Hung et al, 2020 ; Raglin et al, 2020 ). The visual representation of a battlespace should be as accurate and realistic as technologically possible, yet remain at a cognitive level that is human understandable and interpretable ( Kase et al, 2020 ; Larkin et al, 2020 ; Hung et al, 2021 ). Advanced visualization approaches that incorporate mixed reality technologies have the potential to better represent the changing character of multi-domain warfare and its evolving threats and dynamic environments.…”
Section: Required Advancements For Future Military Decision Making Pr...mentioning
confidence: 99%