2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2022.153874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of microsatellite instability by next-generation sequencing, MSI PCR and MMR immunohistochemistry in 1942 solid cancers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…MSI status was determined by interrogation of 130 homopolymer MSI marker sites. MSI-H status was defined as ≥ 20%, MSI-low (MSI-L) as 20–1% and MS-stable (MSS) as < 1%, based on previous studies 51 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MSI status was determined by interrogation of 130 homopolymer MSI marker sites. MSI-H status was defined as ≥ 20%, MSI-low (MSI-L) as 20–1% and MS-stable (MSS) as < 1%, based on previous studies 51 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MLH1 promoter methylation testing (or BRAF mutation testing for CRC; [ 33 ]) and NGS analysis of the tumor may be useful in clarifying the MMR gene mutation status. However, microsatellite analysis by NGS should be validated for each organ system against MMR-IHC and MSI-PCR as the reference method [ 10 , 11 , 28 ].…”
Section: Update On Step-by-step Assessment Of Mmr-ihcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 86 Conversely, those with more comprehensive insurance may find the spectrum of cancers that undergo MMR testing is broader than currently seen in the United Kingdom. 87 Whether someone can access PGD is also determined by their level of insurance cover.…”
Section: The Global Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%