Indications for Heart Valve Replacement by Age Group 1989
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-6900-4_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of Mechanical and Bioprosthetic Valves Following Aortic Valve Replacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Courtman in (1995 indicated that a tissue valve for homograft or xenograft transplant has several advantages such as freedom from coagulation, low incidence of thromboembolism and relative resistance to endocarditis (Courtman et al 1995), however it could be possible that they have less durability than mechanical valves (Borkon et al 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Courtman in (1995 indicated that a tissue valve for homograft or xenograft transplant has several advantages such as freedom from coagulation, low incidence of thromboembolism and relative resistance to endocarditis (Courtman et al 1995), however it could be possible that they have less durability than mechanical valves (Borkon et al 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the beginning of the aortic valve replacement history, the homograft valve was used following simple storage in a cool solution (3). Shortly afterward, a renovated mechanical valve replaced the use of the homograft valve (4). A cryopreservation technique changed the standpoint of the homograft valve (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%