2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of MDCT and MRI in diagnosing chronic gallstone perforation and ileus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite its high sensitivity, MRCP is not routinely performed in acutely ill patients most of all because of longer time of acquisition and insufficient panoramicity. is technique has a sensitivity of 97.7% for gallstone detection, higher than abdominal XR (40-70%), CT scan (90-93%), and even than US (95%), especially in cases of isoattenuating and radiolucent stones that can be missed at abdominal XR and CT, or even in cases of very small ones (<3 mm) [25,26].…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite its high sensitivity, MRCP is not routinely performed in acutely ill patients most of all because of longer time of acquisition and insufficient panoramicity. is technique has a sensitivity of 97.7% for gallstone detection, higher than abdominal XR (40-70%), CT scan (90-93%), and even than US (95%), especially in cases of isoattenuating and radiolucent stones that can be missed at abdominal XR and CT, or even in cases of very small ones (<3 mm) [25,26].…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is technique may arguably be useful in selected cases of GI with the potential to further improve diagnostic yield for noncalcified calculi due to the excellent discrimination of fluid from gallstones, the latter appearing on T2 weighted images as signal voids in the context of the high-signal fluid. Moreover, if sufficient fluid is present in a collapsed cholecystoenteric fistulous tract, it may be delineated on MR images [2]: in their work, Liang and colleagues [25] concluded that MR was more sensitive than CT in detecting and accurately describing the fistula anatomy (100%) ( Figure 13).…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most common site of gallstone impaction has been reported as terminal ileum and ileocecal valve. Less frequent localizations have been reported as jejunum, stomach, duodenum and colon [5]. In our case, the stone was localized in the jejunum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Typically, stones are large and measure several centimeters (2-3 cm). It is important to look for free fluid, free gas, portal venous gas, or mural gas, as signs of more advanced disease and poorer prognosis [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%