2014
DOI: 10.5120/17740-8271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of LPCC, MFCC and BFCC for the Recognition of Hindi Words using Artificial Neural Networks

Abstract: Most important way of communication among humans is language and primary medium used for the said is speech. The speech recognizers make use of a parametric form of a signal to obtain the most important distinguishable features of speech signal for recognition purpose. In this paper, Linear Prediction Cepstral Coefficient (LPCC), Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficient (MFCC) and Bark frequency Cepstral coefficient (BFCC) feature extraction techniques for recognition of Hindi Isolated, Paired and Hybrid words have … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of pre-emphasis is to equal spectral energy by empowering high-frequency components in a speech signal. LPCC is a spectral feature used in the implementation of practical sound recognition systems [40,41].…”
Section: Linear Prediction Cepstral Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of pre-emphasis is to equal spectral energy by empowering high-frequency components in a speech signal. LPCC is a spectral feature used in the implementation of practical sound recognition systems [40,41].…”
Section: Linear Prediction Cepstral Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MFCC are Cepstral coefficients computed on a warped frequency scale which is described on the basis of human auditory perception and LPCC are Cepstral coefficients that correspond to the human articulatory system based on linear prediction. [5]. 11.…”
Section: VImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exception was Chee et al [9], who applied LPCCs with k-nearest-neighbors and linear discriminant analysis classifiers to automatically detect prolongations and repetition stutters, with recognition accuracy up to 89.77%. In the related field of automatic speech recognition ()ASR), MFCCs have consistently generated better results than LPCCs [10,11]; to see if this trend extends to the domain of dysfluency detection, we compare these feature types with DNNs. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%