Comparative analysis of joint encryption and watermarking algorithms for security of biomedical images

Bansal, Siddhant; Mehta, Garima

doi:10.1109/confluence.2017.7943224

Cited by 4 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A pair-wise n x n comparison matrix is created by dividing the row element with column by this equation (10). (10)…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… In the first step, Fuzzy AHP is using to calculating fuzzy choice weights by mathematical statement (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16).…”

Section: Wherementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Next stage, the standardized fuzzy decision matrix is represented by , simplified by the equation (19). (19) www.ijacsa.thesai.org Good (G) (5,7,9) Very good (VG) (7,9,10) After that, the standardization process can be done by the equation (20). ,…”

Section: Wherementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Many methods can be applied to provide security for medical image like steganography, watermarking and encryption. Steganography and watermarking are used for authentication to prevent access to an unauthorized entity [6] [10]. There are a large number of image encryption methods because different applications require different levels of security [10] [11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Steganography and watermarking are used for authentication to prevent access to an unauthorized entity [6] [10]. There are a large number of image encryption methods because different applications require different levels of security [10] [11]. All of these securities techniques are used in transmission of data over the network [12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A Fuzzy Multi-Objective Covering-based Security Quantification Model for Mitigating Risk of Web based Medical Image Processing System

Algarni¹,

Ahmad²,

Attaallah³

et al. 2020

IJACSA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Medical image processing is one of the most active research areas and has big impact on the health sector. With the arrival of intelligent processes, web based medical image processing has become simple and errorless. Web based application is now used extensively for medical image processing. Large amount of medical data is generated daily with more and more data being shared over public and private networks for the diagnosis of diseases through the web based image processing systems. Medical images like that of the CT (Computed Tomography) scan, MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging), X-Ray and Ultrasound images, etc., contain highly personal data of the patients. This data needs to be secured from intruders. Medical images are more sensitive to external interruption and manipulation in data may cause changes in the result. Data breaches in medical cases can lead to wrong diagnosis or even more fatal possibilities with life threatening results. So, security in web based medical image processing is a major issue. However, ensuring security for the medical images while preserving the characteristics of confidentiality, integrity, availability, etc., of medical images poses a major challenge. Working towards a feasible solution, in this study, authors are using a list of criteria for checking security level of the web based image processing system. We propose Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) combined with Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) in the list of criteria that affect the security assessment in medical image processing. At the results we see that FAHP-TOPSIS produce good results in security checking in web based medical image processing system. At the data analysis section all the steps showed which is involved in our model.

show abstract

“…A pair-wise n x n comparison matrix is created by dividing the row element with column by this equation (10). (10)…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… In the first step, Fuzzy AHP is using to calculating fuzzy choice weights by mathematical statement (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16).…”

Section: Wherementioning

confidence: 99%